Who Is Messing With The MDB Water Supply?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 7625
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:58 am
Who Is Messing With The MDB Water Supply?
It seems that someone has recently slipped a few arrogance-enlarging pills, a couple ego-boosting pills, a massive amount of rational thinking pills, and a bunch of brilliant-now pills in the MDB water cooler. (A bizarre and dangerous combination, to be sure)
The result of this pill consumption has negatively changed the MDB (in my opinion).
Has anyone seen anybody lurking around the water cooler lately?
Any clues?
Peace,
Ceeboo
The result of this pill consumption has negatively changed the MDB (in my opinion).
Has anyone seen anybody lurking around the water cooler lately?
Any clues?
Peace,
Ceeboo
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:01 am
Re: Who Is Messing With The MDB Water Supply?
"The best website in prehistory." -Paid Actor www.cavemandiaries.com
Re: Who Is Messing With The MDB Water Supply?
Spurven Ten Sing wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwuUNZGaAGk
Ewwww!
No wonder I drink bottled water all the time! LOL
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11938
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm
Re: Who Is Messing With The MDB Water Supply?
Rambo is in charge of the water cooler, Ceeboo. He got distracted by a Scandinavian nymph at just the wrong moment.
According to Bruce R McConkie, it's possible not all the witch trials were conducted in error. A witch poisoned the water. She came from Salem and quietly slipped it in, then we drank of it.
According to Bruce R McConkie, it's possible not all the witch trials were conducted in error. A witch poisoned the water. She came from Salem and quietly slipped it in, then we drank of it.
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)
The Holy Sacrament.
The Holy Sacrament.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:31 am
Re: Who Is Messing With The MDB Water Supply?
I actually think the tone of the board has become more friendly lately, especially to the more religious inclined. Just my two cents, though.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 16721
- Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am
Re: Who Is Messing With The MDB Water Supply?
Ceeboo wrote:It seems that someone has recently slipped a few arrogance-enlarging pills, a couple ego-boosting pills, a massive amount of rational thinking pills, and a bunch of brilliant-now pills in the MDB water cooler. (A bizarre and dangerous combination, to be sure)
The result of this pill consumption has negatively changed the MDB (in my opinion).
Has anyone seen anybody lurking around the water cooler lately?
Any clues?
Peace,
Ceeboo
Not me. I'm about as humble and modest as one can be. In fact, I'm quite sure you can't find anyone with more humility than mine.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18195
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am
Re: Who Is Messing With The MDB Water Supply?
Runtu wrote:Not me. I'm about as humble and modest as one can be. In fact, I'm quite sure you can't find anyone with more humility than mine.
I believe Dan has you beat in the humility department.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11938
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm
Re: Who Is Messing With The MDB Water Supply?
LOL Runtu.
We are so very 'umble.
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)
The Holy Sacrament.
The Holy Sacrament.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 8261
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 1:40 am
Re: Who Is Messing With The MDB Water Supply?
To quote the sage:
Think you're really righteous? Think you're pure in heart? Well, I know, I'm a million times as humble as thou art
I'm the pioust guy the little mormletts want to be like On my knees day and night scoring points for the afterlife So don't be vain, and don't be whiney Or else my brother might have to get medieval on your hiney!
Fetch!
Think you're really righteous? Think you're pure in heart? Well, I know, I'm a million times as humble as thou art
I'm the pioust guy the little mormletts want to be like On my knees day and night scoring points for the afterlife So don't be vain, and don't be whiney Or else my brother might have to get medieval on your hiney!
Fetch!
It is better to be a warrior in a garden, than a gardener at war.
Some of us, on the other hand, actually prefer a religion that includes some type of correlation with reality.
~Bill Hamblin
Some of us, on the other hand, actually prefer a religion that includes some type of correlation with reality.
~Bill Hamblin
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 7222
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:57 am
Re: Who Is Messing With The MDB Water Supply?
Ceeboo,
I think is is safe to assume that your OP was prompted, in part at least, by some of my posts over on the Scandinavia thread. So, assuming that you were referring to me, at least in part, here are some questions for you.
If one provides physical evidence and states facts that happen to be inconvenient or uncomfortable for right wing religious conservatives, or happen to be contrary to the parts of their world views that are based on unfounded belief, fantasy, magic and delusion, why is that arrogant?
If one can demonstrate that their beliefs about how the world works are based on sound scientific laws, theories and observations, which are reproducible, verified, and the basis for humankind's advances in technology and general well being, must one also fein deference to religious misunderstanding and delusion so as not to be seen as arrogant by religionists?
Is it not possible for religionists to simply accept that the secularist, or the agnostic or (heaven forbid) the atheist, has the intellectual integrity to base their worldview on fact instead of fantasy and let it go at that?
Why must religionists, who deny science and progressive social change, be respected for the damage they do?
What damage, you ask?
To start with, what about the religious crusades against basic human rights with regard to race, gender, reproduction, secular education, scientific inquiry, and sexual preference?
If it turns out that you were not referring to me or my posts, then perhaps you might think about what I have said here anyway.
Peace,
DrW
I think is is safe to assume that your OP was prompted, in part at least, by some of my posts over on the Scandinavia thread. So, assuming that you were referring to me, at least in part, here are some questions for you.
If one provides physical evidence and states facts that happen to be inconvenient or uncomfortable for right wing religious conservatives, or happen to be contrary to the parts of their world views that are based on unfounded belief, fantasy, magic and delusion, why is that arrogant?
If one can demonstrate that their beliefs about how the world works are based on sound scientific laws, theories and observations, which are reproducible, verified, and the basis for humankind's advances in technology and general well being, must one also fein deference to religious misunderstanding and delusion so as not to be seen as arrogant by religionists?
Is it not possible for religionists to simply accept that the secularist, or the agnostic or (heaven forbid) the atheist, has the intellectual integrity to base their worldview on fact instead of fantasy and let it go at that?
Why must religionists, who deny science and progressive social change, be respected for the damage they do?
What damage, you ask?
To start with, what about the religious crusades against basic human rights with regard to race, gender, reproduction, secular education, scientific inquiry, and sexual preference?
If it turns out that you were not referring to me or my posts, then perhaps you might think about what I have said here anyway.
Peace,
DrW
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."
DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."