Page 1 of 1
Cheeky take on LDS Artist's Obama slam
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:14 am
by _Kishkumen
Re: Cheeky take on LDS Artist's Obama slam
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:02 pm
by _bcspace
The problem with that is Romney has correctly understood how and why Obamacare is unconstitutional.
Re: Cheeky take on LDS Artist's Obama slam
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:04 pm
by _Ludd

I think it would have been better if Romney was in blackface.
Re: Cheeky take on LDS Artist's Obama slam
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:16 pm
by _Buffalo
bcspace wrote:The problem with that is Romney has correctly understood how and why Romneycare was unconstitutional.
FIFY.
I agree though that we need single payer, not some half-assed capitalist option like Obamacare.
Re: Cheeky take on LDS Artist's Obama slam
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:33 pm
by _Kishkumen
bcspace wrote:The problem with that is Romney has correctly understood how and why Obamacare is unconstitutional.
Would you send me your picture so I can change this image again?
Re: Cheeky take on LDS Artist's Obama slam
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:35 pm
by _Kishkumen
Buffalo wrote:bcspace wrote:The problem with that is Romney has correctly understood how and why Romneycare was unconstitutional.
FIFY.
I agree though that we need single payer, not some half-assed capitalist option like Obamacare.
Yeah, I am sure all of us are experts in interpreting the Commerce Clause (especially bcspace, despite the disagreement of other conservative legal experts). Slam dunk.
Re: Cheeky take on LDS Artist's Obama slam
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:36 pm
by _Drifting
Kishkumen wrote:
*Following an unprecedented defeat Mitt destroys his Patriarchal Blessing*
Re: Cheeky take on LDS Artist's Obama slam
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:39 pm
by _Kishkumen
Drifting wrote:*Following an unprecedented defeat Mitt destroys his Patriarchal Blessing*
I think you are correct in concluding that Mitt Romney believes that his patriarchal blessing belongs in the US Constitution. I think Senator Hatch may believe the same thing.