DiscussMormonism.com

Nelson just said this,
"Some people erroneously think that these marvelous physical attributes happened by chance or resulted from a big bang somewhere. Ask yourself, could an explosion in a printing shop produce a dictionary? The likelihood is most remote. But if so it could never heal it's own torn pages or reproduce it's own newer editions."

Stormy Waters wrote:Nelson just said this,
"Some people erroneously think that these marvelous physical attributes happened by chance or resulted from a big bang somewhere. Ask yourself, could an explosion in a printing shop produce a dictionary? The likelihood is most remote. But if so it could never heal it's own torn pages or reproduce it's own newer editions."

And the congregation erupted in laughter when he said it. So if you are a science believing Mormon, do you feel ganged up on during this talk, or do you just roll your eyes at the idiocy all around you? I love how later in that talk he quoted from King Benjamin as if he was a real person.

Stormy Waters wrote:Nelson just said this,
"Some people erroneously think that these marvelous physical attributes happened by chance or resulted from a big bang somewhere. Ask yourself, could an explosion in a printing shop produce a dictionary? The likelihood is most remote. But if so it could never heal it's own torn pages or reproduce it's own newer editions."

Will DCP/FAIR take a 'closer look' at what Nelson said?

This is one onion they definitely do not want to keep peeling.

I am glad to know that a dictionary is exactly like a living organism.

Did you guys really expect anything but Creationism to be taught in a religious forum? I don't care if you were listening to a Catholic, Protestant, or Mormon sermon, the Creation would be taught as truth.

just me wrote:I am glad to know that a dictionary is exactly like a living organism.

Me too. I'm also glad to know that an explosion at a printing shop is analogous to 3.5 billion years of gradual change.

Stormy Waters wrote:

just me wrote:I am glad to know that a dictionary is exactly like a living organism.

Me too. I'm also glad to know that an explosion at a printing shop is analogous to 3.5 billion years of gradual change.

Isn't it marvelous?!?!?!?!

DarkHelmet wrote:And the congregation erupted in laughter when he said it. So if you are a science believing Mormon, do you feel ganged up on during this talk, or do you just roll your eyes at the idiocy all around you? I love how later in that talk he quoted from King Benjamin as if he was a real person.

I'm sure there were a good number of members who cringed when he said it. Honestly I'm kind of surprised he said it. I thought the church was on the path towards reconciling with science.

liz3564 wrote:Did you guys really expect anything but Creationism to be taught in a religious forum? I don't care if you were listening to a Catholic, Protestant, or Mormon sermon, the Creation would be taught as truth.

Catholics tend to reject creationism and the arguments like the one Nelson used with it. Not all do, of course, but that is predominant. Liberal protestants are the same way. I think you are confusing believing that God created the world, near universally believed by Christians, with bad creationist arguments purporting to show that.

DarkHelmet wrote: I love how later in that talk he quoted from King Benjamin as if he was a real person.