A theoretical NOMS vs. FARMS long term survival benefit
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:40 am
Wonder if a NOM Wikipedia (sort of like the FARMS/FAIR site but with different answers) be of long term benefit to the Church?
Perhaps those testimonies FARMS might harm NOMS could restore.
Background Data
http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/57397-noooo-big-bang-theory-mocked/
Look at this thread and observe how easily some member newly tuning in could sense the degree of deceptiveness employed by the FARMS line of needing to defend the indefensible. Wouldn't this member gain a heightened degree of skepticism? If this same member was presented with a NOM explanation that may be at variance with Elder Nelson's thoughts on the Big Bang, wouldn't they feel some comfort realizing that science does not need to be swatted aside in religious matters?
Perhaps those testimonies FARMS might harm NOMS could restore.
Background Data
http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/57397-noooo-big-bang-theory-mocked/
Look at this thread and observe how easily some member newly tuning in could sense the degree of deceptiveness employed by the FARMS line of needing to defend the indefensible. Wouldn't this member gain a heightened degree of skepticism? If this same member was presented with a NOM explanation that may be at variance with Elder Nelson's thoughts on the Big Bang, wouldn't they feel some comfort realizing that science does not need to be swatted aside in religious matters?
