MD&D thread on John Dehlin

[_stemelbow]

Stem, your pattern of deceit is laced throughout the threads on this board. We have watched you lie your way through this event, just as you have lied your way through others. All interested parties can follow up on it.

It's not like an epic liar like you would ever cop to your long trail of deceptions. That's not how you roll.

You're kind of like Bob Crockett in that respect. There is a man with no moral compass, just like you.

I appreciate the commentary. I get where you're coming from. But if you got nothing, then you got nothing. I suppose if you got nothing you just spout out some rough comments and watch the masses pat you ont he back. Such is the tact of this joint--Go after Mormons for doing their best, even if they make mistakes.

[_Kishkumen]

Just like ol' Kishkumen. I think it's easier that way. [i]Mormons are liars...that's why I don't like 'em[/]

Temper, temper, stem.

You shouldn't hate me just because I am Mormon. And you certainly shouldn't stereotype all Mormons like me as liars.

You should save such an accusation for a person like yourself, who has demonstrated a consistent pattern of deception.

[_Buffalo]

What's your motivation, then? Have you lost your fear of god but not your slavish devotion to defending NAMIRS members at all costs?

Just interested in truths and seeking out useful ways to communicate. I also hope to help you guys see the light. Not the light as in bringing back itno the Church or whatever, but the light in showing you how your criticisms aren't very valid, quite often.

Clearly not, given your willingness to blatantly and intentionally lie about John Dehlin.

[_Equality]

You lie constantly. Ergo, you are a liar. At least in this place.

Nice try potatoes. Wherein have I lied? And please document a constant supply of lies.

It's documented three posts above where you posted this comment. I swear, you act as if you are getting paid by the post here. Are you playing a drinking game where everyone takes a shot every time you lie and get called on it?

[_Kishkumen]

But if you got nothing, then you got nothing.

Asked and answered, stem.

You fallaciously insinuated the John Dehlin lied. You knew he did not, but you persisted. All of this was about distracting until the heat was off. When John apologizes, being the bigger man, both literally and metaphorically, then you pretended that you think he is some great guy. But it was mostly your satisfaction that the heat was decreasing.

We know how it goes. You're not fooling most of us.

[_Carton]

Who have the apologists ever "banned"? What does it mean to be "banned" from FARMS/MI?

In the case of MI It would look like them not publishing your work.

Interesting stuff. I've heard about this, but never saw it first hand.

However, just the other day Schryver wrote this: Schryver Articles to be Published?

Is Schryver just throwing out more BS, or has the MI changed it's mind? Or maybe he's just going to "publish" his stuff on his DCP's blog or something like that?

[_stemelbow]

Clearly not, given your willingness to blatantly and intentionally lie about John Dehlin.

I didn't blatantly and intentionally lie about him. I clearly expressed how he mischaracterized, thus was dishonest, in his attempt to represent Daniel's blog. I think that was clear. You guys simply won't see his mistake, intentional or not, and will blindly go along drinking kool-aid of some sort. Don't worry, don't think I don't realize how cute it is.

[_Buffalo]

Clearly not, given your willingness to blatantly and intentionally lie about John Dehlin.

I didn't blatantly and intentionally lie about him. I clearly expressed how he mischaracterized, thus was dishonest, in his attempt to represent Daniel's blog. I think that was clear. You guys simply won't see his mistake, intentional or not, and will blindly go along drinking kool-aid of some sort. Don't worry, don't think I don't realize how cute it is.

The more you multiply your falsehood, the more, in theory, God will hold you accountable. Isn't that true?

[_Buffalo]

Is Schryver just throwing out more BS, or has the MI changed it's mind? Or maybe he's just going to "publish" his stuff on his DCP's blog or something like that?

I'm sure it will be self-published. Or published by the kind of publisher that prints UFO books.

[_stemelbow]

Asked and answered, stem.

You fallaciously insinuated the John Dehlin lied. You knew he did not, but you persisted. All of this was about distracting until the heat was off. When John apologizes, being the bigger man, both literally and metaphorically, then you pretended that you think he is some great guy. But it was mostly your satisfaction that the heat was decreasing.

We know how it goes. You're not fooling most of us.

Not really. At some point when the healthy eyed aren't willing to look, it get's old trying to show them. John suggested DCP was claiming any essay was alleged, and thought that was great. When in fact, it was clear, DCP was denying the claim of "hit piece" and "smear". I think you even pointed that out.

I really wanted to just drop it. He seems to. I do to. But you guys are persistent little poops.