Page 1 of 1
Question for Bcspace
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 8:01 pm
by _3sheets2thewind
as the resident judge in Israel,
Is there a difference between being opposed to a stance and working against that stance?
Can a person be a good Mormon and voice disagreement to the Church stance on same sex marriage?
Re: Question for Bcspace
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 6:15 pm
by _Yoda
Bump for BC.
Re: Question for Bcspace
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 7:42 pm
by _bcspace
Is there a difference between being opposed to a stance and working against that stance?
Yes.
Can a person be a good Mormon and voice disagreement to the Church stance on same sex marriage?
No. But unfortunately they might be able to get a TR (harder to do if we can hear your voice). Being a member in good standing has little to do with actually being a good Mormon. At best, it's a sign that you might be a good Mormon.
Re: Question for Bcspace
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 7:49 pm
by _harmony
bcspace wrote:Being a member in good standing has little to do with actually being a good Mormon.
Tell that to Packer.
Re: Question for Bcspace
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 8:21 pm
by _bcspace
Tell that to Packer.
The assumption is that one is not lying and not ignorant when answering the questions.
Re: Question for Bcspace
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 9:46 pm
by _3sheets2thewind
bcspace wrote:Tell that to Packer.
The assumption is that one is not lying and not ignorant when answering the questions.
To clarify, take gambling - the Church opposes gambling in all forms. I am not opposed to gambling, however I do not attend rallies in favor of gambling. Is it honest of me to answer the TR question about supporting things opposed to the church with "No, I do not support groups etc opposed to the Church"
Same situation except I do attend rallies in favor of gambling and I canvas in support of gambling. Have I now crossed the line concerning groups etc opposed to the Church?
Re: Question for Bcspace
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 11:41 pm
by _brade
Looking forward to how this thread develops. If bcspace's understanding of 'in' is any indication (see his sig), this should be interesting.