Page 1 of 3

Dr. Dan Peterson and the curious case of the aroused Pitbull

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:33 pm
by _LDSToronto
Dr. Scratch's title is too....tame.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=24196

H.

Re: Dr. Dan Peterson and the curious case of the aroused Pit

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:49 pm
by _Doctor Scratch
LDSToronto wrote:Dr. Scratch's title is too....tame.

http://www.mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3 ... =1&t=24196

H.


Well, I can change it, if you like.

Re: Dr. Dan Peterson and the curious case of the aroused Pit

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:52 pm
by _LDSToronto
No sir, you must maintain your status as a curious academic. I have no such status to protect.

Re: Dr. Dan Peterson and the curious case of the aroused Pit

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 10:53 pm
by _3sheets2thewind
well it is wonderful insight into DCP fetishes,

pitbulls,
boners,
hot booty shaking.

Not into animals myself, or boners....oh well, everyone has different desires.

Re: Dr. Dan Peterson and the curious case of the aroused Pit

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:02 pm
by _bcspace
No sir, you must maintain your status as a curious academic


Doesn't such maintenance put him in the same category as DCP is being accused of? Something he is not.

Re: Dr. Dan Peterson and the curious case of the aroused Pit

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:04 pm
by _Doctor CamNC4Me
bcspace wrote:Doesn't such maintenance put him in the same category as DCP is being accused of? Something he is not.


What, exactly, is Mr. Peterson being accused of? He clearly watched a rap artist with an erect penis grind up against Jennifer Lopez. That's not in doubt.

Not sure where you're going with this...

- VRDRC

Re: Dr. Dan Peterson and the curious case of the aroused Pit

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:01 am
by _harmony
3sheets2thewind wrote:...or boners....oh well, everyone has different desires.


Then clearly the only choice left for you is lesbian. Because boners are an integral part of heterosexual desires, and gay desires.

Re: Dr. Dan Peterson and the curious case of the aroused Pit

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:31 am
by _bcspace
Doesn't such maintenance put him in the same category as DCP is being accused of? Something he is not.

What, exactly, is Mr. Peterson being accused of?


What does his watching of the video have to do with anything?

Re: Dr. Dan Peterson and the curious case of the aroused Pit

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:33 am
by _DrW
bcspace wrote:What does his watching of the video have to do with anything?

My business partner and I were discussing DCP's little indiscretion last evening over dinner. As I have mentioned here before, my business partner and his entire extended TBM family (something like 30 people) left the Church from one week to the next because of the treatment his faithful son received from the LDS Church after returning from an honorable mission and thereafter coming out as gay. My business partner was on the Stake High Council at the time.

Last evening as we were contemplating DCP's little problem, he was telling me about a Bishop that was released in his home Ward after some of the young men in the Ward were in his home and noticed that he had been visiting inappropriate web sites. Being good and faithful members they ratted him out to the Stake President. Thereafter he was called in for an interview and released. This incident was in Florida in 2003.

So BCSpace, maybe you would like to ask again what DCP watching a boner bump and grind video had to do with anything. If DCP lived in South Florida, he would probably be meeting with the Stake High Council about now.

And his excuse is classic - taken right out of the playbook of child porn offenders when illegal material materials are found on their hard drives. Nobody ever gets any thrill from watching this stuff. It is always there out of simple curiosity or for academic reasons only.

Re: Dr. Dan Peterson and the curious case of the aroused Pit

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:34 am
by _bcspace
So BCSpace, maybe you would like to ask again what DCP watching a boner bump and grind video had to do with anything


It remains on the table.

And his excuse is classic - taken right out of the playbook of child porn offenders when illegal material materials are found on their hard drives. Nobody ever gets any thrill from watching this stuff. It is always there out of simple curiosity or for academic reasons only.


So he IS being accused of something. I'm glad at least someone is willing to admit it. If that is the case then, my question is answered.