DiscussMormonism.com

from the selek thread:

why me wrote:

3sheets2thewind wrote:
Go start a thread about how Bradford is not temple worthy ....you colossal douchebag.

See my point, cwald? This is usual for this board for any defender of the church.

whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradfords action was apstate or apostacy, don't you?
whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradford was not Temple worthy, don't you?

Please whyme, how are you "defender of the church" when you go about literally judging the worthiness of others?

Your conduct related to Bradford, does in fact, qualify you as a douche-bag.

Your conduct related to Bradford, in no way or by the utmost farthing, allows you claim "defender of the Church".

Why me hasn't caught up on the conference version of the Ensign so he hasn't heard Uchdorf say "stop it!".

Drifting wrote:Why me hasn't caught up on the conference version of the Ensign so he hasn't heard Uchdorf say "stop it!".

until then, here is what Uctdorf is saying in street terms.

http://youtu.be/toxIiMWQgKA

3sheets2thewind wrote:
whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradfords action was apstate or apostacy, don't you?
whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradford was not Temple worthy, don't you?
.

Of course we are selective in our reading understanding. Here was my position: I find sending an email firing someone to be offensive and when it is done inside a church institution it is even more offensive. I also said, that I consider such an action worse than a sexual fling. That being the case, I would consider it to be a problem with temple worthiness because the firing showed a lack of love for a fellow brother in the gospel. I saw no love in that action. And the LDS church does teach to love your neighbor. So, my own personal opinion is that church members need to held accountable as to how they treat another human being, even if that treatment happens in the workplace.

I would have the same opinion about church members bullying their subordinates etc.

Drifting wrote:Why me hasn't caught up on the conference version of the Ensign so he hasn't heard Uchdorf say "stop it!".

No, but I heard bob newheart say it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow0lr63y4Mw

why me wrote:

3sheets2thewind wrote:
whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradfords action was apstate or apostacy, don't you?
whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradford was not Temple worthy, don't you?
.

Of course we are selective in our reading understanding. Here was my position: I find sending an email firing someone to be offensive and when it is done inside a church institution it is even more offensive. I also said, that I consider such an action worse than a sexual fling. That being the case, I would consider it to be a problem with temple worthiness because the firing showed a lack of love for a fellow brother in the gospel. I saw no love in that action. And the LDS church does teach to love your neighbor. So, my own personal opinion is that church members need to held accountable as to how they treat another human being, even if that treatment happens in the workplace.

I would have the same opinion about church members bullying their subordinates etc.

Your position is extremely judgmental and is based on only one side, a side(DCP) you have been known to defend all the time. Try and be a little more open minded, instead of being a DCP acolyte.

why me wrote:

3sheets2thewind wrote:
whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradfords action was apstate or apostacy, don't you?
whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradford was not Temple worthy, don't you?
.

Of course we are selective in our reading understanding. Here was my position: I find sending an email firing someone to be offensive and when it is done inside a church institution it is even more offensive. I also said, that I consider such an action worse than a sexual fling. That being the case, I would consider it to be a problem with temple worthiness because the firing showed a lack of love for a fellow brother in the gospel. I saw no love in that action. And the LDS church does teach to love your neighbor. So, my own personal opinion is that church members need to held accountable as to how they treat another human being, even if that treatment happens in the workplace.

I would have the same opinion about church members bullying their subordinates etc.

So your Doctrinal position is he is a murderer

Asking why me why he isn't an active member, and/or why he defends LDS is like asking a wino why he won't get a job and stop drinking.

why me wrote:

3sheets2thewind wrote:
whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradfords action was apstate or apostacy, don't you?
whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradford was not Temple worthy, don't you?
.

Of course we are selective in our reading understanding. Here was my position: I find sending an email firing someone to be offensive and when it is done inside a church institution it is even more offensive. I also said, that I consider such an action worse than a sexual fling. That being the case, I would consider it to be a problem with temple worthiness because the firing showed a lack of love for a fellow brother in the gospel. I saw no love in that action. And the LDS church does teach to love your neighbor. So, my own personal opinion is that church members need to held accountable as to how they treat another human being, even if that treatment happens in the workplace.

I would have the same opinion about church members bullying their subordinates etc.

3sheets2thewind wrote:So your Doctrinal position is he is a murderer

Lol. I see what you did there.

Why me is too busy deciding who is a worthy Mormon and who isn't. Who is a good Catholic or not, and on and on.

Considering the fact that he doesn't practice either, it is the epitome of hypocrisy.

He likes to make his little pronouncements and accusations, and not deal with any of the rebuttal with any substance.

He talks to imaginary nuns and priests, so I would imagine many of his Mormon conversations involve some invisible people as well.

He reminds me of a little bird that comes out of Bavarian clocks every hour.