Page 1 of 4
Questions for BC
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:30 pm
by _Yoda
What, exactly do you mean when you say that I am showing my "true colors"? Have I been anything than less than up front about my feelings? I can assure you that I have not, either on, or off the board.
Why was the family not allowed to enter the temple with their son to get his endowments? I understand if you feel that you cannot give specifics, but can you please address whether or not their "unworthiness" involved merely "paying attention" during Church meetings?
Also, as a past seminary teacher myself, and someone who is familiar with CES, I can assure you that if a child attends class, you are obligated to mark them present...just food for thought.
So, yes, BC, please come back to the thread and answer our questions.
Here are a couple more. How is it concluded, for attendance purposes, if someone is not paying attention? Do you, for instance, instruct the Ward Clerk to mark people not present who are playing with their iPods? I am sure that the ward budget committee loves that!
What, exactly, is discussed in these "meetings" regarding NOMs? What are your goals? How do you expect these goals to be obtained? What is your action plan?
Re: Questions for BC
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:48 pm
by _consiglieri
I'm betting BC goes conveniently AWOL.
Re: Questions for BC
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:06 pm
by _Bob Loblaw
consiglieri wrote:I'm betting BC goes conveniently AWOL.
As is his wont. It's amusing to see him set himself up as some sort of moral-spiritual arbiter of all that is good, and yet run away in cowardice when someone points out that he's being an asshole.
Re: Questions for BC
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:10 pm
by _consiglieri
BC showed up this morning to post a couple of links in a light-hearted thread he started.
I took the opportunity to call him out and redirect his attentions to the questions posed by Liz.
Re: Questions for BC
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:18 pm
by _bcspace
What, exactly do you mean when you say that I am showing my "true colors"?
Merely referring to your choice of language by which I and many others righteously judge attitude and spiritual condition.
I'm betting BC goes conveniently AWOL.
As is his wont.
I've always answered all questions. This does not mean I respond to every thread and post. The answer may already be obvious before you asked the question (or the question you should have asked).
Re: Questions for BC
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:22 pm
by _Bob Loblaw
consiglieri wrote:BC showed up this morning to post a couple of links in a light-hearted thread he started.
I took the opportunity to call him out and redirect his attentions to the questions posed by Liz.
He won't show up. He never does when he's been called out.
If he's telling the truth about the church's current concern about "NOMs" infiltrating their numbers, what does that say about the church's confidence for the future? It smacks of people who are scared shitless that their organization is crumbling from within.
Re: Questions for BC
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:24 pm
by _Bob Loblaw
bcspace wrote:Merely referring to your choice of language by which I and many others righteously judge attitude and spiritual condition.
In the same way I and others see your choice of language (and topics) and righteously judge you to be a self-righteous asshole.
I've always answered all questions. This does not mean I respond to every thread and post. The answer may already be obvious before you asked the question (or the question you should have asked).
You have a long history of making assertions and then, when you are shown to be mistaken, you walk (or run) away. Everyone here recognizes that, including you.
Re: Questions for BC
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:32 pm
by _lulu
bcspace wrote:What, exactly do you mean when you say that I am showing my "true colors"?
Merely referring to your choice of language by which I and many others righteously judge attitude and spiritual condition.
I'm betting BC goes conveniently AWOL.
As is his wont.
I've always answered all questions. This does not mean I respond to every thread and post. The answer may already be obvious before you asked the question (or the question you should have asked).
I always answer all questions even when I don't.
Re: Questions for BC
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:33 pm
by _Bob Loblaw
lulu wrote:I always answer all questions even when I don't.
This.
Re: Questions for BC
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:49 pm
by _Morley
Bob Loblaw wrote:consiglieri wrote:BC showed up this morning to post a couple of links in a light-hearted thread he started.
I took the opportunity to call him out and redirect his attentions to the questions posed by Liz.
He won't show up. He never does when he's been called out.
Again.