Holy crap that was seriously delusional. Unbelievably so.
(a) high in egalitarianism
Is that why we must wait to take the sacrament until the presiding leader has first taken it? Or why we must stand when an apostle or other GA enters the chapel? Is that why anyone in a leadership capacity with the title of President is supposed to be referred to as President so-and-so, all the time?
broad leadership participation
As long as you have a penis there is some truth to this, as long as you have no facial hair, and wear the "right" color of shirt.
contributions of all members
Certainly contributions of all members are accepted, in the monetary sense.
lifelong learning and education
So long as what you are learning isn't something that contradicts church teachings. Ask members how excited they are about reading more about the origins of some of their own holy scriptures, like, say, the Book of Abraham?
compassion and service to others
As part of trying to convert, reactivate, or retain them in the church, then yes.
tolerance toward others
ROFLMAO.
and what is called “abundant community” – and (b) low in inequality, hierarchy, class distinctions, resistance to new ideas and learning, self-centeredness, intolerance, and separateness.
Low in inequality? I'm not sure that's entirely accurate. As far as hierarchy goes, the church is about as hierarchical as it gets unfortunately. Class distinctions? Ok, I'll buy that mostly, except for the GAs, who are decidely of a different "class" within the church.
And low in separateness? Ok, maybe since the church seems to be jettisoning a lot of its old-time beliefs in order to fit more comfortably with mainstream Protestantism, the separateness is slowly being worn away. But historically this church has been as separate as it's possible to be, to the point where in the past the church would advise its members to separate themselves from whereever they lived and move to Utah to "gather with the Saints in Zion" or whatever.