DiscussMormonism.com

Hi gang,

Something to keep in mind, when it comes to a certain video project, there are two people that I am most concerned about keeping happy; My wife and my attorney.

Beyond that, I simply don't give a damn what other people want, desire and/or believe was "promised."

My desire to avoid jail and/or a lawsuit Trump's all else.

That is all.

Nort

I think if you really didn't care you wouldn't be posting about it at all.

Stormy Waters wrote:I think if you really didn't care you wouldn't be posting about it at all.

Naw, there's just a few people that seem to be getting their panties in a bunch because I didn't post a crystal clear video yesterday of Mitt Romney in the temple. Apparently I PROMISED I would do so on the 23rd. I did no such thing.

I have other things to consider before I post anything. Namely the opinions of my lawyer and my wife.

Pussy.

LDSToronto wrote:Pussy.

Yes, I would indeed like to continue to have access to my wife's...and if I blatantly ignore the advice of an attorney that I pay, my wife will have hers sewn shut.

So...the name calling...yeah...that's what I'm referring to when I say I don't give a damn. There are things most people are unaware of and it will likely stay that way.

Did you even post a video?

3sheets2thewind wrote:Did you even post a video?

A video was posted about a week early. It's the one titled The Mormon Temple: OFFICIAL TRAILER

There are more videos to come before the election.

Nortinski wrote: Apparently I PROMISED I would do so on the 23rd. I did no such thing.

What do you call this?:

Mr. Norton is part of a larger group. HE does not control what goes out and when. September 23rd will still be a big day, but you'll be treated to quite a few videos before then.

There are 7 of us and majority vote rules.

Noah 1/7

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=24839&p=638087#p638087

P.S. Hopefully, Shades will leave this up if Nortinski/newnamenoah asks him to go back and delete it. We've had some issues with this guy saying things, then having his posts disappear into the ether, and then denying what was said in the disappeared posts. I hope that doesn't happen again.

Nortinski wrote:Yes, I would indeed like to continue to have access to my wife's...and if I blatantly ignore the advice of an attorney that I pay, my wife will have hers sewn shut.

So...the name calling...yeah...that's what I'm referring to when I say I don't give a damn. There are things most people are unaware of and it will likely stay that way.

When you came on this board in the summer, you were questioned about the legality of what you said you were planning to do. You answered then that you had run it all by your legal counsel and they had cleared it. Were you lying then or are you lying now?
As for your wife, she is OK with the 9 videos you have posted on YouTube already but she draws the line at putting up the same videos with Romney's face showing? Sounds implausible to me. Sounds like you are making excuses, and not very good ones at that. Not that I really care. But you definitely said before that you had video of Romney in the temple, you got pretty worked up when skeptics challenged you on it, and you said you would prove it on September 23. You didn't.

If you are worried about the legal ramifications, why not sell it or give it to a media outlet that is not afraid of the legal issues? I seriously doubt The Sun in the UK would worry about releasing the video.