http://www.mormoninterpreter.com/Christ ... ary-china/
Early on, Midgley notes that he was "aroused" and experienced a "climax" after contact with Chinese graduate students:
It was only later when I encountered Chinese graduate students at Brigham Young University that my interest in their immense, diverse, and wonderful homeland was aroused. The climax of this experience was the reaction of some of those students (while we were reading together Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America) to the series of events that took place in and around Tiananmen Square (beginning on 15 April and ending on 4 June 1989).
Though people typically view the Tiananmen Square "events" as being indicative of a surge in interest in democracy in communist China, Midgley instead sees it as an opportunity to begin encouraging the spread of Christianity. (He says, repeatedly, how "amazed" and "stunned" he is about these developments.)
Later, Midgley rather bizarrely excerpts this passage from the book under review:
(typo ibid)“Will popular Christianity,” Lian asks at the end of his book, “inspire a violent uprising?” His conclusion: “Given the overwhelming power of the centralized state in contemporary China, there is little likelihood in the near future that a fragmented, however spirited, Christian movement will foment popular revolt” (p. 246). As interesting as his speculation about what he calls “the long run” might be, what interest [sic] me the most about his book are his accounts of some truly amazing and quite unanticipated events that have taken place in the last four decades in China.
Why, I wondered, did Midgley opt, in this very short "review," to zero in on an apparent throw-away speculation about "violent revolt"? It seems telling somehow.
The best thing about the "review" is how short it is: Midgley quickly wraps up with some vaguely paternalistic language that one imagines Edward Said having a field-day over:
I have longed to understand the peoples and their ways in that ancient land. I am confident that other Latter-day Saints are also concerned about the future of the covenant people of God in China.
The biggest problem with Midgley's review is precisely this: he doesn't actually seem legitimately interesting in "the peoples"; he seems, instead, interested in how many people the LDS Church can count--he's rather like a greedy CEO, rubbing his palms together and salivating over the prospect of expanding into a fresh marketplace of over a billion new potential customers. He appears to view this as yet another part of the Mopologists' ongoing warfare, and it isn't an especially pretty sight.