Speaking up in Gospel Doctrine class yesterday
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:31 pm
Yesterday in Sunday School, I decided to speak up for a change when the discussion came round to 2 Nephi 26:9-10, which basically says that the greater things taught by Jesus were not written down, but only enough to try the faith of the reader, “and if it so be that they shall believe these things then shall the greater things be made manifest unto them.”
Two weeks ago I sat silent while it was taught that nothing beyond faith, repentance, baptism and the Holy Ghost should be taught or sought after. I decided to weigh in at this point.
I was sitting in the third pew from the front directly in front of the teacher, so when I raised my hand, she couldn’t very well miss me. When called upon, I said that there seems to be a disconnect between the Mormonism of Joseph Smith and the Mormonism of today; that in the Book of Mormon the mysteries of God are something that we are encouraged to seek out and discover; that in fact this passage goes on to say that the “greater things” are withheld “unto their condemnation.” But nowadays we are told the mysteries of God are things that should be left alone and not delved into.
The teacher took my comments in good stride, and left it to others in the class to voice alternate opinions.
The teacher came back to a quote from Spencer W. Kimball regarding the sealed portion of the gold plates to the effect that when he asks how many would like to read their contents, almost all hands go up; but when he asks how many are obeying the commandments we have, almost no hands go up. President Kimball concluded with the observation that we won’t get anything more until we are obeying what we have.
Feeling that if I’m in for a penny, I’m in for a pound, I raised my hand again and said that what President Kimball says here tends toward the newer strain of Mormonism in not seeking out the mysteries; that he accomplishes this by setting a standard of perfection on the part of the saints before anything new will come; but that the standard of perfection is not something any individual can attain, much less the entire body of saints.
The teacher agreed that perfection would not be possible to attain.
I followed it up by asking the teacher whether the saints in Joseph Smith’s day were perfect. She immediately said no. I said that in spite of their imperfections, they nevertheless received an overflowing surge of revelation from Joseph Smith in the form of sections in the D&C, the JST, and even new books of scripture like the Book of Abraham.
Somebody behind me was then called on who said that if we were not worthy to know what is in the sealed portion, that knowledge would condemn us. My thought was that the perfection I had just pushed out the front door had crawled in through the back window.
I observed that according to this passage in the Book of Mormon, what is required to understand the “greater things” is not works or perfection, but simply “belief” in what is written.
All told, I felt much better about speaking up in class.
My thanks to Why Me.
All the Best!
--Consiglieri
Two weeks ago I sat silent while it was taught that nothing beyond faith, repentance, baptism and the Holy Ghost should be taught or sought after. I decided to weigh in at this point.
I was sitting in the third pew from the front directly in front of the teacher, so when I raised my hand, she couldn’t very well miss me. When called upon, I said that there seems to be a disconnect between the Mormonism of Joseph Smith and the Mormonism of today; that in the Book of Mormon the mysteries of God are something that we are encouraged to seek out and discover; that in fact this passage goes on to say that the “greater things” are withheld “unto their condemnation.” But nowadays we are told the mysteries of God are things that should be left alone and not delved into.
The teacher took my comments in good stride, and left it to others in the class to voice alternate opinions.
The teacher came back to a quote from Spencer W. Kimball regarding the sealed portion of the gold plates to the effect that when he asks how many would like to read their contents, almost all hands go up; but when he asks how many are obeying the commandments we have, almost no hands go up. President Kimball concluded with the observation that we won’t get anything more until we are obeying what we have.
Feeling that if I’m in for a penny, I’m in for a pound, I raised my hand again and said that what President Kimball says here tends toward the newer strain of Mormonism in not seeking out the mysteries; that he accomplishes this by setting a standard of perfection on the part of the saints before anything new will come; but that the standard of perfection is not something any individual can attain, much less the entire body of saints.
The teacher agreed that perfection would not be possible to attain.
I followed it up by asking the teacher whether the saints in Joseph Smith’s day were perfect. She immediately said no. I said that in spite of their imperfections, they nevertheless received an overflowing surge of revelation from Joseph Smith in the form of sections in the D&C, the JST, and even new books of scripture like the Book of Abraham.
Somebody behind me was then called on who said that if we were not worthy to know what is in the sealed portion, that knowledge would condemn us. My thought was that the perfection I had just pushed out the front door had crawled in through the back window.
I observed that according to this passage in the Book of Mormon, what is required to understand the “greater things” is not works or perfection, but simply “belief” in what is written.
All told, I felt much better about speaking up in class.
My thanks to Why Me.
All the Best!
--Consiglieri