Page 1 of 6
Case No. 20120452 A Must READ (Links)
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 1:23 pm
by _The Mighty Builder
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/86256713/UTSC%2 ... 0Brief.pdfhttp://dl.dropbox.com/u/86256713/UTSC%2 ... 0Brief.pdfThe reason for this posts is to simply show that the Mormon Church is in a Utah State Supreme Court case where they are afraid of the Plaintiff's claims.
Everyone who wants to understand what the Mormon Church really cherishes should read these two Briefs. Despite their VERY public claims of doing more for Sex Abuse Victims than ANY OTHER Organization, when they are being sued, they threaten to do away with the HELP LINE if the Plaintiff prevails in court. This shows their VERY VERY Corporate side and belittles their supposed Christian side. It is and always has been about the MONEY!
Therefore I removed my comments that started the distraction.
Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:48 pm
by _The Mighty Builder
REMOVED BY TMB
Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:56 pm
by _Yoda
The Mighty Builder wrote:I wonder how many Child Sex Abusers Romney protected?
That's a pretty outlandish statement about someone you don't even know.
Look, I know that there are bishops out there who are creeps, but there are also bishops who are good men, who are fathers, who would do anything to make sure that no harm came to a child.
Several posters on this board served as bishops, and were fantastic bishops. Jason Bourne comes to mind immediately.
I don't think it is right for you, or anyone, to make that type of blatant statement accusing someone without proof.
Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:02 pm
by _Stormy Waters
liz3564 wrote:I don't think it is right for you, or anyone, to make that type of blatant statement accusing someone without proof.
I agree with this. When it comes to child abuse no accusations/implications should be made without substantial evidence.
Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:16 pm
by _The Mighty Builder
REMOVED BY TMB
Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:20 pm
by _Yoda
The Mighty Builder wrote:Lets see, 34% of all Boy Scout Troops are sponsored by the Mormon Church and yet only 2% of the Known Child Sex Abusers are Mormons? Sounds like a cover up to me.
That doesn't give you any right to name specific people without proof.
Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:34 pm
by _The Mighty Builder
REMOVED BY TMB
Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:59 pm
by _Themis
The Mighty Builder wrote:Lets see, 34% of all Boy Scout Troops are sponsored by the Mormon Church and yet only 2% of the Known Child Sex Abusers are Mormons? Sounds like a cover up to me.
Possibly, but we should also take into account the church calls people to be scout masters as apposed to people volunteering.
Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:00 pm
by _Drifting
liz3564 wrote:That doesn't give you any right to name specific people without proof.
Oh the irony...
Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:02 pm
by _harmony
Drifting wrote:liz3564 wrote:That doesn't give you any right to name specific people without proof.
Oh the irony...
Oh, stop. That was beneath you.
