When this whole witch hunt has begun, it was about genitals (especially the David statue) and breasts (
this caricature, please steal a glance at it...)
Both picture was prompt deleted.
There were nothing said about NSFW. Absolute nothing.
Would have been deleted only the [
img] BBCode, could have the readers look at them - when their wife and/or boss is out of eyeshot.
To the whole NSFW idea:
imho, EVERY picture can be NSFW, any picture can show that it is not about the work the employee is paid for.
Is this SFW? --->
viewtopic.php?p=656748#p656748 (near full screen, can be seen from 5 meter distance)
And this is not? -->
http://www.scrivener.net/blogbinariesQ3 ... hekilt.jpg (330x264 pixel, and
the critical part of the picture is 20x20 px, one character size)
by the way the google image search of "Colonel Simon West" gives that
kilt picture above in the first line - and
http://mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3/vie ... =1&t=24782 in the fourth line...
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei