Regarding moderation and censorship

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_LDSToronto
_Emeritus
Posts: 2515
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:11 am

Regarding moderation and censorship

Post by _LDSToronto »

Dr. Shades wrote:I guess I projected a little when I (falsely) assumed that everyone was as interested in adhering to the "spirit of the law" as I am. Instead, it looks like people are far more interested in pushing boundaries and finding loopholes.


What is mightier: the Spirit or the Letter? Claiming the former is noble; the latter Letter, less. Yet claims of virtue are unequal to virtue. Shades, you've doctored a fanciful facade that barely covers your erect pedantry. Literalism is your chief domain. Fussy perfectionism rules this land under an ever-correcting eye. Moderate moderation? Never! Punctilious dictatorship governs all. And all are subject to a precise measure.

Letter, it seems, is mightier than Spirit. Letter stomps. Letter kills. Letter reigns to crush Spirit. Doctor of Letters, Honoris Causa, we have given breath to Spirit and in turn she directed a thrust towards the ignorant ramparts that imprison free expression. Designs on bringing Spirit back to this once great plain, she died, alone, crushed, eyes towards the sky, a tear as she gasped, "Mapplethorpe...master, bring me home".

Weeping is all there is now. Our last great stand seen as nothing more than a game of Letters. A moderating conscience unaffected, unchanged, unmoved, ever more entrenched. Fair Ludwig rots in a prison of limited expression. And a pedant rules us all.

H.
"Others cannot endure their own littleness unless they can translate it into meaningfulness on the largest possible level."
~ Ernest Becker
"Whether you think of it as heavenly or as earthly, if you love life immortality is no consolation for death."
~ Simone de Beauvoir
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Regarding moderation and censorship

Post by _harmony »

LDSToronto wrote: Designs on bringing Spirit back to this once great plain, she died, alone, crushed, eyes towards the sky, a tear as she gasped, "Mapplethorpe...master, bring me home".


Mapplethorpe? All that, and you end with Mapplethorpe?

Good grief.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Blixa
_Emeritus
Posts: 8381
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm

Re: Regarding moderation and censorship

Post by _Blixa »

harmony wrote:
LDSToronto wrote: Designs on bringing Spirit back to this once great plain, she died, alone, crushed, eyes towards the sky, a tear as she gasped, "Mapplethorpe...master, bring me home".


Mapplethorpe? All that, and you end with Mapplethorpe?

Good grief.


You and I part way, harmony. Dear god almighty.
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
_LDSToronto
_Emeritus
Posts: 2515
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:11 am

Re: Regarding moderation and censorship

Post by _LDSToronto »

harmony wrote:
LDSToronto wrote: Designs on bringing Spirit back to this once great plain, she died, alone, crushed, eyes towards the sky, a tear as she gasped, "Mapplethorpe...master, bring me home".


Mapplethorpe? All that, and you end with Mapplethorpe?

Good grief.


Yes. Poignant, no?

H.
"Others cannot endure their own littleness unless they can translate it into meaningfulness on the largest possible level."
~ Ernest Becker
"Whether you think of it as heavenly or as earthly, if you love life immortality is no consolation for death."
~ Simone de Beauvoir
_Stormy Waters

Re: Regarding moderation and censorship

Post by _Stormy Waters »

You were allowed to post artwork that had a vagina as a central focus.
You were allowed to post the full name of a poster, his weight, and the ages of his kids.

So I'm curious what exactly do you want to post that you haven't been able to?
_LDSToronto
_Emeritus
Posts: 2515
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:11 am

Re: Regarding moderation and censorship

Post by _LDSToronto »

Stormy Waters wrote:
So I'm curious what exactly do you want to post that you haven't been able to?


If that is what you took away from my post, then the good doctor has indeed successfully recruited a clone of himself to moderate our playground.

H.
Last edited by Guest on Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Others cannot endure their own littleness unless they can translate it into meaningfulness on the largest possible level."
~ Ernest Becker
"Whether you think of it as heavenly or as earthly, if you love life immortality is no consolation for death."
~ Simone de Beauvoir
_LDSToronto
_Emeritus
Posts: 2515
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:11 am

Re: Regarding moderation and censorship

Post by _LDSToronto »

Stormy Waters wrote:You were allowed to ...


And let's be clear about one thing: No one gives me allowance. I take. I do. I suffer no patronage.

H.
"Others cannot endure their own littleness unless they can translate it into meaningfulness on the largest possible level."
~ Ernest Becker
"Whether you think of it as heavenly or as earthly, if you love life immortality is no consolation for death."
~ Simone de Beauvoir
_Tarski
_Emeritus
Posts: 3059
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:57 pm

Re: Regarding moderation and censorship

Post by _Tarski »

Huh?
This just has to be overwrought. I have been posting here for years and have never been censored at all despite my tendency toward blue topics and sloppy grammar. I can't remember being corrected either despite my refusal to use a spell checker or to proof read what I post.

Come to think of it, I do remember the first few weeks and months of this board. There were essentially no rules.
All we had at the time was an echo chamber with a few people like Norton and Polygamy Porter having fun with the F-word.
The board never took off until a few rules were put in place.
To this day it seems nearly impossible to get bannned without intentionally inviting the action and for a long while I think it actually was impossible.

Is there a Mormon themed message board that you think does a better job? (Honest question)
when believers want to give their claims more weight, they dress these claims up in scientific terms. When believers want to belittle atheism or secular humanism, they call it a "religion". -Beastie

yesterday's Mormon doctrine is today's Mormon folklore.-Buffalo
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: Regarding moderation and censorship

Post by _RockSlider »

Tarski wrote:Is there a Mormon themed message board that you think does a better job? (Honest question)


I tire of a few long time posters who seem to have a need to push the limits, who attack moderators and even the administrator, and those who continually push the limits of in real life violations.

In the case of this image war, apparently between a few long time posters and the administrator of this board, show some respect.

Shades desire for a work safe environment is very important to me, as I browse from work, and his recently restated and long standing rule of P/PG/R is straight forward enough.

My stay as a moderator maybe short but I will be calling for consequences to follow those that consistently post inappropriate material to the wrong forum and for those that persist in in real life threats.

I encourage all posters to report any incidences that they see.
_Stormy Waters

Re: Regarding moderation and censorship

Post by _Stormy Waters »

LDSToronto wrote:
Stormy Waters wrote:
So I'm curious what exactly do you want to post that you haven't been able to?


If that is what you took away from my post, then the good doctor has indeed successfully recruited a clone of himself to moderate our playground.

H.


I thought a couple of concrete examples would help make your case for "censorship."

Also I don't find your condescension impressive, persuasive, or intimidating.
Post Reply