Page 5 of 11
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:17 pm
by _LDSToronto
harmony wrote:*sigh*
It's simple, LDST: PG means no pictures of genitals.
So I can post:
1. Male nipples?
2. Female nipples
3. Female breasts?
4. Bare buttocks?
5. A woman wearing a micro bikini?
6. A woman in a chilly room?
7. The anus (male or female)?
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:19 pm
by _Chap
LDST has managed something I did not think was possible: he has become boring.
Really, really boring. This is the kind of thing I might have expected from an obsessed teenager.
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:20 pm
by _ludwigm
RockSlider wrote:I'm confused, Ludwigm has been punished by shades (the one) for what ... six months, a year? During this time zee has been a poster I click on every time to see the wonderful art he has posted. As well as others that have decided to post images with their thoughts.
Before you and others keep pushing shades to free ludwigm, how were the masses being censored or punished because of the private actions of shades/ludwigm.
Your free ludwigm campaign is what is punishing the masses for the actions of one.
You (all, plural) seem to forget something:
Were my actions worth to punish?
Were my pictures - the critical ones - NSFW? (without mentioning this criterium)
Am I the one who showed
breasts and/or
genitals? (THESE were the criteri
a at that time...)
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:24 pm
by _RockSlider
LDSToronto wrote:Challenge accepted. Let me know when you guys become untouchable douche-bags, will you?
Seems we have already achieved that status in your book.
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:24 pm
by _harmony
LDSToronto wrote:harmony wrote:*sigh*
It's simple, LDST: PG means no pictures of genitals.
So I can post:
1. Male nipples?
yes2. Female nipples
no3. Female breasts?
no4. Bare buttocks?
no5. A woman wearing a micro bikini?
no6. A woman in a chilly room?
if she's clothed7. The anus (male or female)?
no
Bare male chests are considered appropriate by society for general viewing. Bare female chests are not. Bare buttocks and anuses are likewise not. Thus a micro bikini is not. Nor is a thong.
You are a smart man. You know this. Abiding by the few rules we have is neither difficult nor onerous. I'm still not seeing the reason for this angst, when the rules are clear: G, PG, R... this is not hard.
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:28 pm
by _LDSToronto
Chap wrote:LDST has managed something I did not think was possible: he has become boring.
Really, really boring. This is the kind of thing I might have expected from an obsessed teenager.
And yet here you are....reading. Kind of like a bad accident, you can't avert your gaze, no matter how hard you try.
H.
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:29 pm
by _LDSToronto
RockSlider wrote:LDSToronto wrote:Challenge accepted. Let me know when you guys become untouchable douche-bags, will you?
Seems we have already achieved that status in your book.
Douche-bags, yes. Untouchable. Not yet.
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:32 pm
by _LDSToronto
harmony wrote:LDSToronto wrote:
So I can post:
1. Male nipples? yes
2. Female nipples no
3. Female breasts? no
4. Bare buttocks? no
5. A woman wearing a micro bikini? no
6. A woman in a chilly room? if she's clothed
7. The anus (male or female)? no
Bare male chests are considered appropriate by society for general viewing. Bare female chests are not.
Where I live - Ontario, Canada, it is perfectly appropriate and legal for a woman to be bare-chested in public. Society has approved.
What standard are you using?
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:33 pm
by _Chap
LDSToronto wrote:Chap wrote:LDST has managed something I did not think was possible: he has become boring.
Really, really boring. This is the kind of thing I might have expected from an obsessed teenager.
And yet here you are....reading. Kind of like a bad accident, you can't avert your gaze, no matter how hard you try.
H.
OK. I've said my say. So I'll just try to ignore this thread for a while. But I am really sorry to see you so hung up, and sounding just a bit silly as a result.
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:35 pm
by _Chap
LDSToronto wrote:
What standard are you using?
My final word: maybe the standards of a board that does not want to repel all potential Mormon posters the minute they catch sight of some of the images recently posted here.
Bye now.