Internet Mormons, Chapel Mormons, Critics, Apologists, and Never-Mo's all welcome!
https://discussmormonism.com/
LDSToronto wrote:Wait, is that the new law? No more image posting? Seems a little harsh, doesn't it?
Dr. Shades wrote:LDSToronto wrote:Wait, is that the new law? No more image posting? Seems a little harsh, doesn't it?
I wasn't implying that everyone shouldn't post images. You seem to be very confused about what's G / PG / R, so the safest course of action in your particular case would be for you to not post images at all until your confusion ebbs.
RockSlider wrote:rest assured ldst, that is exactly why I bought this up. Please review this thread and note I have not posted anything in red. This has not been an oversight.
you however have attacked me, as a normal poster on this board as if I have posted as a moderator.
Hopefully in the future you will be able separate these two, and attack moderation, if and when its actually moderation.
Rockslider's Opinion, not that of a MOD but hat of a MAN wrote:I tire of a few long time posters who seem to have a need to push the limits, who attack moderators and even the administrator, and those who continually push the limits of in real life violations.
In the case of this image war, apparently between a few long time posters and the administrator of this board, show some respect.
Shades desire for a work safe environment is very important to me, as I browse from work, and his recently restated and long standing rule of P/PG/R is straight forward enough.
My stay as a moderator maybe short but I will be calling for consequences to follow those that consistently post inappropriate material to the wrong forum and for those that persist in in real life threats.
Rockslider's Sure Knowledge, not gained through MOD status but through other means wrote:All I know is if those fighting for ludwigm's freedom have hindered zeezrom's super fine art posting past ... and that he will now be censored based on their need to set that law, that they might push it's boundaries, they have done MDB a disservice.
LDSToronto wrote:How would I ever know that you had a rule in your head that I should have guessed ahead of time?
Dr. Shades wrote:LDSToronto wrote:How would I ever know that you had a rule in your head that I should have guessed ahead of time?
You'd know by the descriptions of the various fora on the index page.
LDSToronto wrote:Where I live - Ontario, Canada, it is perfectly appropriate and legal for a woman to be bare-chested in public. Society has approved.
What standard are you using?
harmony wrote:LDSToronto wrote:Where I live - Ontario, Canada, it is perfectly appropriate and legal for a woman to be bare-chested in public. Society has approved.
What standard are you using?
USA standard G/PG/R.
This is not difficult, LDST. You are a smart man. There is nothing mysterious or confusing about this.
