Page 9 of 11
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 9:51 pm
by _honorentheos
Stormy Waters wrote:Change your avatar Stak. You've effectively posted a picture of a penis in every forum you've posted in
I think you should let him be, Stormy. In the moment it may have some contextual meaning beyond just being a picture of what it is to some posters here. But not for long.
Personally, I think choosing a flacid, stone dick as an avatar should be anyone's right. Especially Stak. ;)
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:56 pm
by _MrStakhanovite
Stormy Waters wrote:Change your avatar Stak. You've effectively posted a picture of a penis in every forum you've posted in
Looks like someone already disabled my avatar function, so problem solved.
In any case, gotta give me some credit, I managed to put over 4,000 penises on this forum in a short amount of time. Not even Paulie Ozborne could do that.
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:56 pm
by _MrStakhanovite
honorentheos wrote:Personally, I think choosing a flacid, stone dick as an avatar should be anyone's right. Especially Stak. ;)
Finally, somebody who "gets me".
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:01 pm
by _lulu
I've lost a penis.
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:01 pm
by _3sheets2thewind
Is the statue of David a permissible avatar?
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:04 pm
by _MrStakhanovite
lulu wrote:I've lost a penis.
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:08 pm
by _MrStakhanovite
3sheets2thewind wrote:Is the statue of David a permissible avatar?
All of it, but not the penis no doubt. Which makes one question if I had just posted the shaft, would it still have gotten me punished (for a lack of a better term)? The matter is moot, because this is going over Shades' head anyways.
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:45 pm
by _Chap
Come back Droopy - all is forgiven.
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 2:50 am
by _3sheets2thewind
MrStakhanovite wrote:3sheets2thewind wrote:Is the statue of David a permissible avatar?
All of it, but not the penis no doubt. Which makes one question if I had just posted the shaft, would it still have gotten me punished (for a lack of a better term)? The matter is moot, because this is going over Shades' head anyways.
Just kicking the ant bed here......so we can post the word penis in reference to the male penis in this forum, but a picture of a penis with scrotum is probebited. No doubt it is not permissible to refer to some one as a penis.
However, I created a thread about boners - no, you gutter rats not like pit bull gets a boner, but rather DCPs boners (mistake) in watching pit bull get a boner from hot booty shaking.
Though I used the term boner appropriately - the definition of the Peterson Danites - the whole thread was moved to the telestial board. Perhaps it was a boner of the mods in moving it....nonetheless I did not chortle.
Re: Regarding moderation and censorship
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 3:14 am
by _honorentheos
MrStakhanovite wrote:honorentheos wrote:Personally, I think choosing a flacid, stone dick as an avatar should be anyone's right. Especially Stak. ;)
Finally, somebody who "gets me".
First the stone...penis, then a bukowski? This is getting kinky.