
Tara Marynowsky
The Russians, 2009
sunstoned wrote:Growing up in an uber TBM family, it was modeled for me to view the big 15 as inspired, chosen leaders. Anything they (first presidency, Q12, Seventies) said was considered a straight channel from God. My parents were big on obedience, blind obedience. They still are.
My father still brings up quotes from general conference or area authority speeches to try and chastise me into repenting and returning to the fold. He cannot get over the fact that I do not recognize their authority. He and my mother have wasted their lives and resources following the teachings of a bunch of frauds.
My parents are foolish, but I am convinced that many, if not all of the GAs know they do not get revelation or speak for God. They might have convinced themselves they are doing a good thing, kind of an ends justifies the means thing. But deception is deception, and in my opinion, they are lower than dirt.
sock puppet wrote:So you allow for the possibility that some of the GAs might simply be delusional rather than frauds. Generous of you, very generous of you.
RockSlider wrote:It is interesting that you never hear in GC anymore ... a "Special Witness" from our Special Witnesses
zeezrom wrote:As TBMs, did you ever look at the 12 apostles differently than normal people? Did you consider them to be unreachable icons, representing the standards of our beliefs? Did you ever look at them as regular people? I, for one, never did look at them as regular people. While I never looked at the 12 as perfect, I did look at them as icons and symbols. I think this was a mistake. It prevented me from ever criticizing their ideas. By missing out on the human aspect of the leaders of my religion, they had become empty shells. The image below is a nice depiction of what they were to me.
LDSToronto wrote:
Oh to be a GA. I'd work it.
H.
zeezrom wrote:As TBMs, did you ever look at the 12 apostles differently than normal people? Did you consider them to be unreachable icons, representing the standards of our beliefs? Did you ever look at them as regular people? I, for one, never did look at them as regular people. While I never looked at the 12 as perfect, I did look at them as icons and symbols. I think this was a mistake. It prevented me from ever criticizing their ideas. By missing out on the human aspect of the leaders of my religion, they had become empty shells. The image below is a nice depiction of what they were to me.
Tara Marynowsky
The Russians, 2009
LDSToronto wrote:Rock stars. The 15 are rock stars to most, especially to the women. So much fawning over them and jockeying for position when they are around. I swear, if it weren't for the law of chastity, those guys would get a boatload of...well, you know..
I'm serious - it astounds me how gushy women get over these guys when they are around. And the LDS men - they are like hangers-on, echoing every word that comes out of their mouths.
Oh to be a GA. I'd work it.
H.
sunstoned wrote:Growing up in an uber TBM family, it was modeled for me to view the big 15 as inspired, chosen leaders. Anything they (first presidency, Q12, Seventies) said was considered a straight channel from God. My parents were big on obedience, blind obedience. They still are.
My father still brings up quotes from general conference or area authority speeches to try and chastise me into repenting and returning to the fold. He cannot get over the fact that I do not recognize their authority. He and my mother have wasted their lives and resources following the teachings of a bunch of frauds.
My parents are foolish, but I am convinced that many, if not all of the GAs know they do not get revelation or speak for God. They might have convinced themselves they are doing a good thing, kind of an ends justifies the means thing. But deception is deception, and in my opinion, they are lower than dirt.