Everybody Wang Chung wrote:I don't think your response to my CFR says much for your character.
My posts are not anonymous. I am not here to debate my character. It is what it is, foul or good. But, thank you very much for deleting your old sig line and replacing it with the new one.
Everybody Wang Chung wrote:I don't think your response to my CFR says much for your character.
My posts are not anonymous. I am not here to debate my character. It is what it is, foul or good. But, thank you very much for deleting your sig line with a fake post, fake in the sense that you made it look like I was posting as a representative of my firm.
Yahoo,
CFR again.
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."
Yahoo Bot wrote:I can't give you a "CFR" because I am not calling for anything.
As explained above, I can't give you an "R" because you obligingly deleted the offending post; thank you very much.
Your new sig line, with the additional line, fully complies with my demands. Thanks again.
Yahoo,
No problem. I think you learned a valuable lesson today. Namely, not to accuse people of "creating fake posts", unless you actually have some examples of said person creating a "fake post".
I'm also sure you'll never do it again. We all make mistakes.
Peace out, honkey
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."
CFR. Certainly even you can make the simple distinction between a "fake post" and a name?
by the way, your words about me being an anyonymous member of the bar hurt like daggers.
Later, hippy.
I certainly have concerns about a member of the bar saying rather cruel and false things about Dr. Peterson as you did in your post with the mockery hit piece proposed. And anonymously so. And, calculated to injure him in his profession. Tsk tsk; all rather harsh things.
Yahoo Bot wrote:I certainly have concerns about a member of the bar saying rather cruel and false things about Dr. Peterson as you did in your post with the mockery hit piece proposed. And anonymously so. And, calculated to injure him in his profession. Tsk tsk; all rather harsh things.
Thanks again for fixing your sig line.
I would be concerned about a certified physician saying rather cruel and false things about John Dehlin.
Indeed, I would be concerned about Mormons saying cruel and false things about other Mormons.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist