Homo Love'n - The New Chic in Politics and the Pew (link)

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_The Mighty Builder
_Emeritus
Posts: 1593
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 9:48 pm

Homo Love'n - The New Chic in Politics and the Pew (link)

Post by _The Mighty Builder »

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02 ... snhp&pos=2

Clint Eastwood has joined more than 100 Republicans in arguing that gays and lesbians should be allowed to legally wed, the advocacy group waging the legal battle against California's ban on same-sex marriage said Thursday.

Manny Rivera, a spokesman for the American Foundation for Equal Rights, confirmed to NBC News that Eastwood had signed the brief to be filed with the Supreme Court in the Proposition 8 case. Calls and an email placed to representatives for the Oscar-winning actor and director were not immediately returned.
Last edited by Guest on Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: Homo Lov'en - The New Chic in Politics and the Pew (link

Post by _bcspace »

They can be legally wed now in every state. However, there is no reason for any state or THE state to recognize such marriages.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_3sheets2thewind
_Emeritus
Posts: 1451
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:28 pm

Re: Homo Lov'en - The New Chic in Politics and the Pew (link

Post by _3sheets2thewind »

bcspace wrote:They can be legally wed now in every state. However, there is no reason for any state or THE state to recognize such marriages.



There is no reason for a State to recognize any marriage.
_The Erotic Apologist
_Emeritus
Posts: 3050
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:07 pm

Re: Homo Lov'en - The New Chic in Politics and the Pew (link

Post by _The Erotic Apologist »

bcspace wrote:However, there is no reason for any state or THE state to recognize such marriages.

On the contrary, there are plenty of reasons for THE state to recognize such marriages: "...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed..."

3sheets2thewind wrote:There is no reason for a State to recognize any marriage.

At the risk of contradicting myself, I'd have to say I'm with you on this one. Marriage is a social institution, not a political institution, in my opinion.
Last edited by Guest on Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Surprise, surprise, there is no divine mandate for the Church to discuss and portray its history accurately.
--Yahoo Bot

I pray thee, sir, forgive me for the mess. And whether I shot first, I'll not confess.
--Han Solo, from William Shakespeare's Star Wars
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: Homo Lov'en - The New Chic in Politics and the Pew (link

Post by _Some Schmo »

I don't know about anyone else, but I want the state to recognize my marriage for tax and probate reasons (among others), but that's just me.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_3sheets2thewind
_Emeritus
Posts: 1451
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:28 pm

Re: Homo Lov'en - The New Chic in Politics and the Pew (link

Post by _3sheets2thewind »

Some Schmo wrote:I don't know about anyone else, but I want the state to recognize my marriage for tax and probate reasons (among others), but that's just me.


The recognition of marriage by the State does not serve the State.

Individuals want lower tax burdens, but that means less money for the State, which means less public monies for public general needs.
Post Reply