Love Crush for Science Just to Get Over the Love of God

[_Nightlion]

I trust most of us have lived long enough to realize we never did get over falling in love or having a real crush on someone until the next one came along. This is why so many fall in love with science. It is such a big hunk of loving all in all. Yeah, it buries God in the sand and is the hipster innovator shelling out all the slick ways and means to give us all the comfy life. Wont even give God a second look. And we deny that everything of science is really based upon what God has made. No! We need to be done with that. Warts and all we embrace the repugnant conclusions that diminish us and leave us no purpose or design to life. Small sacrifice to finally shake from our conscience an overbearing guilt of having not lived up to the expectations of a first love.

What if it was not your fault at failing your beloved intended?
What if it was incompetent administrators who muddied the water and left no clean place to stand or get to really know God in the first place? Oh, the sorrows upon finding out Mr. Science was a con and a great fraud at heart. Long nights cryin' by the record machine, dreaming of your chevy and your old routine.

[_sock puppet]

I trust most of us have lived long enough to realize we never did get over falling in love or having a real crush on someone until the next one came along. This is why so many fall in love with science. It is such a big hunk of loving all in all. Yeah, it buries God in the sand and is the hipster innovator shelling out all the slick ways and means to give us all the comfy life. Wont even give God a second look. And we deny that everything of science is really based upon what God has made. No! We need to be done with that. Warts and all we embrace the repugnant conclusions that diminish us and leave us no purpose or design to life. Small sacrifice to finally shake from our conscience an overbearing guilt of having not lived up to the expectations of a first love.

What if it was not your fault at failing your beloved intended?
What if it was incompetent administrators who muddied the water and left no clean place to stand or get to really know God in the first place? Oh, the sorrows upon finding out Mr. Science was a con and a great fraud at heart. Long nights cryin' by the record machine, dreaming of your chevy and your old routine.

Damn, Mr. Science, I am in your clutches!

[_DrW]

I trust most of us have lived long enough to realize we never did get over falling in love or having a real crush on someone until the next one came along. This is why so many fall in love with science. It is such a big hunk of loving all in all. Yeah, it buries God in the sand and is the hipster innovator shelling out all the slick ways and means to give us all the comfy life. won't even give God a second look. And we deny that everything of science is really based upon what God has made. No! We need to be done with that. Warts and all we embrace the repugnant conclusions that diminish us and leave us no purpose or design to life. Small sacrifice to finally shake from our conscience an overbearing guilt of having not lived up to the expectations of a first love.

What if it was not your fault at failing your beloved intended?
What if it was incompetent administrators who muddied the water and left no clean place to stand or get to really know God in the first place? Oh, the sorrows upon finding out Mr. Science was a con and a great fraud at heart. Long nights cryin' by the record machine, dreaming of your chevy and your old routine.

Damn, Mr. Science, I am in your clutches!

Why couldn't NL have made anthropomorphic Science a Ms.?

Is making Science male a reflection of NL's misogyny or of some deep seated longing as yet unfulfilled?

[_honorentheos]

Why couldn't NL have made anthropomorphic Science a Ms.?

Is making Science male a reflection of NL's misogyny or of some deep seated longing as yet unfulfilled?

Total derail, but I wonder if it's because we subconsciously associate being a con with the masculine? Even though English lacks gendered nouns like other languages have, I think we have an innate tendancy to place certain works in gender catagories, and "con" is one of them.

[_The Erotic Apologist]

I've always attributed a distinctly feminine gender to the term science.

[_honorentheos]

I've always attributed a distinctly feminine gender to the term science.

Proof that DCP is right, even when he's wrong. You just wanted to be seduced by science...

[Guest]

Yeah...because I just don't find DCP all that seductive.

[_Nightlion]

Damn, Mr. Science, I am in your clutches!

Why couldn't NL have made anthropomorphic Science a Ms.?

Is making Science male a reflection of NL's misogyny or of some deep seated longing as yet unfulfilled?

Not a unseemly as you suppose. God is masculine even though I believe him not a sexual being. No offense Zeez but most false gods are masculine as well.

[_The Erotic Apologist]

God is masculine even though I believe him not a sexual being.

No endless celestial sex with his exalted plural wives?

[_Nightlion]

God is masculine even though I believe him not a sexual being.

No endless celestial sex with his exalted plural wives?

None, no wives. We are never to become as he is. That was the great lie given to the Mormons obviously heady enough to keep them a people all the while they were trampling upon the Gospel of the Restoration and refusing faith towards a real Zion. See 2 Thessalonians chapter 2...I do believe exaltation IS the continuation of the seeds/plural/both in the world/physical/and out of the world/spiritual as is the case with Adam and Eve. Exaltation is always subject to the one true God. LDS scripture proves this but the Mormons do not want to see it.