Should I have paid gross or net? Should I have only paid on my discretionary funds?
Do a Google search on "LDS tithing gross vs. net" and you will see many people are asking because nobody from LDS leadership is informing the members on how to do it.
According to http://www.businessdictionary.com:
Discretionary Funds are the portion of an entity's income available for saving, or spending on non-essentials. It is what remains after expenses for basics (such as food, clothing, shelter, utilities) and prior commitments (such as school fees and loans) are deducted from the disposable income. Total amount of discretionary income in an economy is a key indicator of the level of possible economic growth...
Questions:
1. Has LDS leadership ever promoted paying tithing on discretionary funds instead of gross income?
2. If answer to #1 is NO, then why not? Why have they left this issue ambiguous? Are they banking on receiving more revenues from unwitting members that pay on gross?
3. Is LDS leadership aware of how vastly unequal discretionary funds are among the different economic classes in the world?
4. Does LDS leadership understand the burden they lay on members with minimal discretionary funds as compared to those with much more?
5. Does LDS leadership believe in equality among God's children?
6. Is LDS leadership aware of the suffering caused by their silence on the issue?