NewNameNoah's New Video

[_Manfred]

Since it discusses and portrays temple content, I won't link to it, but here's a screen cap to whet your appetite.

[screen capture deleted]

[_TrashcanMan79]

I'm guessing the whole point of the screen cap (and, most likely, this thread) is to expose Noah's face, which is pixellated throughout the entire video with the exception of this single microsecond. Since you're subscribed to Noah's channel, surely you saw this video?

[_Bret Ripley]

I look forward to his new videos almost as much as I look forward to exciting new photographic evidence of 'Badge Man' on the grassy knoll.

[_Manfred]

Why was this picture deleted from my post?

[screen capture deleted]

[_Dr. Shades]

Why was this picture deleted from my post?

Because the person depicted in the picture intends for his face to be concealed, as evidenced by the fact that it was pixelated out throughout the entire thing except for the microsecond it mistakenly wasn't--that you were careful to capture.

[_Natsunekko]

Why was this picture deleted from my post?

Because the person depicted in the picture intends for his face to be concealed, as evidenced by the fact that it was pixelated out throughout the entire thing except for the microsecond it mistakenly wasn't--that you were careful to capture.

Did you actually watch the video? His face is pixelated for about 33 seconds, at which point he snaps his fingers and the pixelization vanishes. His face is visible for the much of the remaining video. There's nothing to indicate he actually wants his face to be hidden.

[_Dr. Shades]

Did you actually watch the video? His face is pixelated for about 33 seconds, at which point he snaps his fingers and the pixelization vanishes. His face is visible for the much of the remaining video. There's nothing to indicate he actually wants his face to be hidden.

Manfred's screen capture was from an entirely different video; not the one to which TrashcanMan79 linked.

[_Natsunekko]

Did you actually watch the video? His face is pixelated for about 33 seconds, at which point he snaps his fingers and the pixelization vanishes. His face is visible for the much of the remaining video. There's nothing to indicate he actually wants his face to be hidden.

Manfred's screen capture was from an entirely different video; not the one to which TrashcanMan79 linked.

Oh...my bad.

[_Manfred]

Why was this picture deleted from my post?

Because the person depicted in the picture intends for his face to be concealed, as evidenced by the fact that it was pixelated out throughout the entire thing except for the microsecond it mistakenly wasn't--that you were careful to capture.

So what? Since when is it the job of Mormon Discussions moderators to compensate for the mistakes others make on YouTube?

Here's a screen cap of a video where Noah doesn't pixelate his face. You gonna delete this, too? You know, in case it's a mistake?

Idiot.

[_Mercury]

Interesting. It appears that this individual who goes by "mike Norton" a.k.a. newnamenoah a.k.a. a cornucopia of sock puppets and such is running what appears to be a confidence game. An individual with an easily obtained video that required some fairly easily circumvented security protocols expects the world to revolve around him. Not only does he have a history of online harassment, but he has no real ethics about how he conducts himself online.

Did the Romney video ever exist? Who knows. If Scott Prouty could get a video published of romney giving the finger to half of the US population, I think a former bail bondsman could have been able to shop around a video of romney to at least Mother Jones. No, instead what this individual did was....well, nothing. Nothing at all. Which is exactly why this individual is detrimental to how others perceive me and others who have rejected a certain lifestyle. To strident Mormons we are all Mike Norton and Ed Decker.