Nightlion wrote:Lincoln was great EOS nothing ill is said nor believed of him.
Joseph was great EOS everything ill IS said and believed of him.
What does "EOS" stand for?
Nightlion wrote:Lincoln was great EOS nothing ill is said nor believed of him.
Joseph was great EOS everything ill IS said and believed of him.
Dr. Shades wrote:Nightlion wrote:Lincoln was great EOS nothing ill is said nor believed of him.
Joseph was great EOS everything ill IS said and believed of him.
What does "EOS" stand for?
Nightlion wrote:Nobody has been better researched than Abraham Lincoln. All the details are on the table. Yet, he gets all his sins covered because you just do not mess with Lincoln. Johnny Carson always said you cannot tell a Lincoln joke. It always falls flat. He sits in his memorial like a Zeus. I like Lincoln. I love his meekness and great speeches.
Lincoln was great EOS nothing ill is said nor believed of him.
Joseph was great EOS everything ill IS said and believed of him.
I dare say Joseph was the better man. And if he had lived and had became president there never would have been a Civil War. I dare say.
bcspace wrote:Lincoln did not belong to the one true Church, though he might now.
Nightlion wrote:See? I am not going to list Lincoln's sins and probables. The point is fixed.
He had serious flaws but even his wife takes the hit, not him.
The Gettysburg Address over the Book of Mormon.
![]()
![]()
![]()
If this cannot prove extreme prejudice then extreme prejudice is unprovable.
Saw Skooh wrote:If we were asked to accept Lincoln as God's one true chosen vessel and mouthpiece on Earth, second only to Jesus Christ Son of God, and dedicate our lives, time, talents, families, and wealth to his church (and no other!) in exchange for salvation from sin and even death itself, and if anyone on this board advocated such, then your comparison might be remotely meaningful and relevant. Until then, it falls flat.
Also, whatever criticisms there are to be leveled at Lincoln, they mostly have little to do the things for which he is revered. For Joseph, on the other hand, most of his questionable methods, behaviors, and motives are directly or closely connected with the very things that are claimed to make him so great: his scriptures, doctrines, supernatural talents, and revelations.
Markk wrote:Nightlion wrote:Nobody has been better researched than Abraham Lincoln. All the details are on the table. Yet, he gets all his sins covered because you just do not mess with Lincoln. Johnny Carson always said you cannot tell a Lincoln joke. It always falls flat. He sits in his memorial like a Zeus. I like Lincoln. I love his meekness and great speeches.
Lincoln was great EOS nothing ill is said nor believed of him.
Joseph was great EOS everything ill IS said and believed of him.
I dare say Joseph was the better man. And if he had lived and had became president there never would have been a Civil War. I dare say.
Your wrong on all accounts...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITkBdHjnBq8
Nightlion wrote:
Indeed, Lincoln is revered, albeit serendipitously, as the Patron Saint of Modern Atheism.
That sealed with his own blood after the slaughter of 750,000 Americans. He sowed the seeds of the rise of modern atheism by his public recrimination of Providence because both sides prayed to the same God. How could God favor either side in the great conflict?
The Civil War started one year after Charles Darwin published his Origin of the Species. We can trace Satan's cunning manipulation of modern society toward his aim at the Great Provocation that ends our world as we know it.
Jason Bourne wrote:Nightlion wrote:See? I am not going to list Lincoln's sins and probables. The point is fixed.
He had serious flaws but even his wife takes the hit, not him.
The Gettysburg Address over the Book of Mormon.
![]()
![]()
![]()
If this cannot prove extreme prejudice then extreme prejudice is unprovable.
Actually Lincoln takes lots of hits. How many bios have you read? I have read two lengthy ones. He was a politicain through and through and aspired to greatness and glory. Many argue he way over stepped his constitutional authority. He was a product of his time regarding the issues of the blacks and slavery. He was not perfect and no true historian thinks he is and he has mane critics.