DiscussMormonism.com

Bazooka wrote:

I’m routinely accused of acts of mean-spirited wickedness and unchristian cruelty. Nevertheless, with depressingly amusing regularity, when I ask for specific examples of my misbehavior my request is met with confident boasts, promises, and, in the end, little or nothing. It always ends not with a bang, but a whimper. There have been no exceptions.

I’m not exactly biting my nails in suspense on such occasions, either. I know with perfect assurance that my supposedly gross acts of heartless cruelty don’t exist. They never did.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeterso ... where.html

So Scratch et al.....put up or shut up.....

Another example of Mormoniciousness or Mormons too stupid to realize they are stupid.

"FARMS has often had a polemical edge and we are curious to see how or whether that will be accommodated,'' he said. ``The minute I write something offensive, we'll see if I get a call.''

1997, Peggy Stack, quoting Daniel Peterson.

hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....,.....

nobody's posted a link to anything

ya can't just say crap and ask people to believe it's true

And let's not forget his gossiping about Mike Quinn's sexual orientation before Quinn came out.

I've never seen any actual evidence for this............where is it? are you a truth seeker or a gossip monger, rollo?

Ceeboo wrote:

Kishkumen wrote:
Is the pope Catholic?

Yes!

(What do I win?)

Peace,
Ceeboo

Let's see....I will recommend to Shades that you get a 90% raise on what you are currently paid for posting here! How's that?

informant wrote:hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....,.....

nobody's posted a link to anything

ya can't just say crap and ask people to believe it's true

And let's not forget his gossiping about Mike Quinn's sexual orientation before Quinn came out.

I've never seen any actual evidence for this............where is it? are you a truth seeker or a gossip monger, rollo?

DCP said it himself -- it was years ago, probably on ZLMB (or possibly the early FAIR board (the precursor of MAD)). I read his very words, so no gossip on this one.

DCP said it himself -- it was years ago, probably on ZLMB (or possibly the early FAIR board (the precursor of MAD)). I read his very words, so no gossip on this one.

so you don't have a link or a quote or anything................

just as i thought

y'know, if you're going to condemn someone for something for almost a decade it might be nice to have actual evidence that they actually did the thing you are condemning them for

but of course you don't, so you're a gossip monger

hey one time i heard DCP say that he truly believes pigs can fly! its true! it was on ZLBM back in the day, or some blog post that he deleted........yeah..........that's it

i would challenge DCP to point out where anyone has ever accused him of "wickedness" or "cruelty".

Kishkumen wrote:

Tom wrote:Or has Peterson created a strawman for his own purposes?

Is the pope Catholic?

does water ripple when a duck farts?

palerobber wrote:i would challenge DCP to point out where anyone has ever accused him of "wickedness" or "cruelty".

no need. i will put it out there.

the grant palmer piece and the dehlin piece were wicked and cruel.

the issue is not whether dan has been cruel or wicked, it is his semantics and definition of wickedness and cruelty.

i will go even farther. the dehlin piece and the palmer piece were not just cruel in their treatment of the named targets. what he did was cruel to his staff, cruel to the other professors at byu, cruel to the institution and just plain reckless. taking such ridiculous liberties with other peoples' professions and the maxwell institute is wicked in its selfishness and vanity. eff that guy.

eta. i have been watching the game of thrones. my tolerance for wickedness and cruelty may be skewed. in fact, i think wickedness and cruelty generally suck but they may have a place in real life sometimes. i am certainly not above it. i have pulled some crappy stunts along the way for sure. what i have not done, is pretend that i am anything but perfect while using my resources to kick the everloving crap out of someone or to promote some nonsense. i have done other things instead.

Fence Sitter wrote:
It is merely a more sophisticated version of Spacecadet type claims to victory.

that is exactly what i thought. it has space logic all over it. i disagree that it is sophisticated. but i agree that is space-ish.