Coping with the "Big List" of Attacks on the LDS Faith

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_DarkHelmet
_Emeritus
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:38 pm

Re: Coping with the "Big List" of Attacks on the LDS Faith

Post by _DarkHelmet »

ldsfaqs wrote:In this case "attacks" against Mormonism are almost 100% perverted falsehoods and outright lies, while defenses for the faith are almost 100% the full and actual truth.


Well, I'm convinced. :rolleyes:
"We have taken up arms in defense of our liberty, our property, our wives, and our children; we are determined to preserve them, or die."
- Captain Moroni - 'Address to the Inhabitants of Canada' 1775
_omni
_Emeritus
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 5:10 am

Re: Coping with the "Big List" of Attacks on the LDS Faith

Post by _omni »

[quote="ldsfaqs"]

(side note.... wow Jeff is in China now? cool)[/quote]

I have it on good authority that Jeff had been laying the ground work for missionaries to be allowed in China. In fact my BIL just got his call to mainland China, but it's hush, hush do don't tell anyone. Hastening the work indeed...
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Coping with the "Big List" of Attacks on the LDS Faith

Post by _Themis »

ldsfaqs wrote:
Fence Sitter wrote:How is a big list of attacks any different than a big list of defenses, like Lindsey's web site?


In this case "attacks" against Mormonism are almost 100% perverted falsehoods and outright lies, while defenses for the faith are almost 100% the full and actual truth. One seeks to destroy light and truth while pretending to be for light and truth, while the other actually IS light and truth.

Understand now?



Everyone understands you have quite the fantasy going on inside your head. :wink:
42
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Re: Coping with the "Big List" of Attacks on the LDS Faith

Post by _Runtu »

ldsfaqs wrote:In this case "attacks" against Mormonism are almost 100% perverted falsehoods and outright lies, while defenses for the faith are almost 100% the full and actual truth. One seeks to destroy light and truth while pretending to be for light and truth, while the other actually IS light and truth.

Understand now?



When I read this kind of stuff, I see this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUAK7t3Lf8s
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_SteelHead
_Emeritus
Posts: 8261
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 1:40 am

Re: Coping with the "Big List" of Attacks on the LDS Faith

Post by _SteelHead »

And it is idiocy like that, that qualifies faqs as the only forum user on my ignore list. His rants have 0 value.
It is better to be a warrior in a garden, than a gardener at war.

Some of us, on the other hand, actually prefer a religion that includes some type of correlation with reality.
~Bill Hamblin
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Re: Coping with the "Big List" of Attacks on the LDS Faith

Post by _Runtu »

SteelHead wrote:And it is idiocy like that, that qualifies faqs as the only forum user on my ignore list. His rants have 0 value.


I saw it only because someone else quoted him. I have two people on my ignore list: ldsfaqs, and a recent arrival who likewise adds no value to the experience here.
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_mackay11
_Emeritus
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 3:12 pm

Re: Coping with the "Big List" of Attacks on the LDS Faith

Post by _mackay11 »

Sammy Jankins wrote:The last throwaway line is a head scratcher. As another commenter responded. The LDS church isn't exactly gathering much attention in China. So why would the letter?


This might have already been answered but Jeff currently lives and works in Shanghai. I knew him while I was working over there last year. He's a nice guy and we met up for lunch quite often. There are about 500 active members (expats) in Shanghai and Jeff is often the 'go-to' person when people have history questions. Perhaps he's expecting to get some other members ask about it.
Post Reply