Page 8 of 12
Re: Keith A. Crandall's Careless DNA Claims
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 10:59 pm
by _Brackite
No, he is using his specialized knowledge about certain issues to show certain claims, religious or not, are incorrect. This is what people should be doing if they know or believe certain claims are not correct. His advantage over you is he knows the subject, and backs up what he thinks is accurate. This is why no one takes you seriously.
+100
Re: Keith A. Crandall's Careless DNA Claims
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:36 pm
by _Gunnar
CFR. I have never seen Simon suggest Crandell cannot offer his opinions. He only says, and shows why, that he thinks he is incorrectly advocating certain positions the science does not support. Since he has communicated this to him, he can at any time show how he thinks is is correct.
You on the other hand just attack him without even a hint you know anything about the subject. This is why your participation is at the level of trolling, and Simon knows enough not to engage this kind of biased ignorance.
42
Themis
God
Posts: 7528
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:43 am
This also deserves a +100.
There is absolutely no justification for the idea that religious truth claims should be held to any less rigorous standards of critical scrutiny and evidence than scientific claims.
Re: Keith A. Crandall's Careless DNA Claims
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:52 pm
by _Tobin
Brackite wrote:No, he is using his specialized knowledge about certain issues to show certain claims, religious or not, are incorrect. This is what people should be doing if they know or believe certain claims are not correct. His advantage over you is he knows the subject, and backs up what he thinks is accurate. This is why no one takes you seriously.
+100
Welcome to ignore Brackite. If you are just going to engage in childish cheerleading, I have no use for you.
Re: Keith A. Crandall's Careless DNA Claims
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:53 pm
by _mcjathan
Tobin wrote:... still using your immature boyish view of the world when assessing the truth.
....However, if not, he could be vastly mistaken about a great many things.

Re: Keith A. Crandall's Careless DNA Claims
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 12:08 am
by _Themis
Re: Keith A. Crandall's Careless DNA Claims
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 1:51 am
by _Tator
Wow and wow, so many +100s deserved here. Man you people are so patient with this Bozo and I am so not. I always said I would make a poor doctor because I have no patience.
Re: Keith A. Crandall's Careless DNA Claims
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:08 am
by _DarkHelmet
Gunnar wrote:
There is absolutely no justification for the idea that religious truth claims should be held to any less rigorous standards of critical scrutiny and evidence than scientific claims.
But it's the only way religious claims have a chance to compete in the marketplace of ideas? It's like the mercy rule in youth sports when one team is getting clobbered by another team. You have to change the rules to let the losing team score a couple points so they don't feel too bad.
Re: Keith A. Crandall's Careless DNA Claims
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:13 am
by _GrandMoffTarkin
Tobin,
I was going to respond but I feel others have done an excellent job of demonstrating that your position does not hold up to scrutiny. I think you need to give it up now.
Re: Keith A. Crandall's Careless DNA Claims
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:37 am
by _Tobin
GrandMoffTarkin wrote:Tobin,
I was going to respond but I feel others have done an excellent job of demonstrating that your position does not hold up to scrutiny. I think you need to give it up now.
I have most of the people participating in this thread on permanent ignore and I do not read their posts nor feel any need to ever respond to them because they are so derogatory and impolite. So, if you wish to make a serious point, I'll be happy to respond. Otherwise, you are welcome to quit the field at any time.
Re: Keith A. Crandall's Careless DNA Claims
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:52 am
by _Tator
Tobin wrote:I have most of the people participating in this thread on permanent ignore and I do not read their posts nor feel any need to ever respond to them because they are so derogatory and impolite. So, if you wish to make a serious point, I'll be happy to respond. Otherwise, you are welcome to quit the field at any time.
So basically you're in an echo chamber of your own making debating yourself?