Son of Shoulder Porn

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Bazooka
_Emeritus
Posts: 10719
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:36 am

Re: Son of Shoulder Porn

Post by _Bazooka »

Craig Paxton wrote:
Bazooka wrote:Craig, please can you post a warning about your link? I opened it, saw naked shoulders and now I have to go see my Bishop....



My Dear Bazooka,

Please accept my deepest apologies for my insensitivity in exposing you to the evil influence of the exposed shoulders of women found in that link. I personally know how naked shoulders can drive we men crazy at the sight of bare female flesh, tantalizingly peeking out below a hemline or a cap sleeve let alone a bare shoulder. It was inconsiderate of me not to have placed a warning notice when I posted that link…a link that needlessly exposed you and others to the enticing influences of bare exposed female shoulders…it’s difficult enough when these images dance across our minds but to have them there before our very eyes in picture form…ogling and beguiling us…Oh the depth of the shame I feel for placing you and others in a situation where you were exposed to these evil influences…I am forever sorry.

Craig


Craig, whilst I accept your apology, I have subsequently had to resign my calling as Bishop of a ward in Boise Idaho.....
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
_cinepro
_Emeritus
Posts: 4502
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:15 pm

Re: Son of Shoulder Porn

Post by _cinepro »

Craig Paxton wrote:In the lastest attempt to sexualize high school students again a Utah school is imposing Mormon dress standards on their students... so the students decided to stage a walk out

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/58442 ... e.html.csp


I can understand the argument that having a dress code for toddlers and young children somehow "sexualizes" them, but I don't see how having a dress code for teenagers who are already living in a highly sexual culture somehow adds to that "sexualization". It seems entirely appropriate to have some standard of what is appropriate to wear to school, even if there might be some disagreement over what that standard is.
_Craig Paxton
_Emeritus
Posts: 2389
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:28 pm

Re: Son of Shoulder Porn

Post by _Craig Paxton »

cinepro wrote: It seems entirely appropriate to have some standard of what is appropriate to wear to school, even if there might be some disagreement over what that standard is.



How bout these...they pretty much cover everything...guess we could call them Mormon Burkas Image Although the one to the right...seems a bit too revealing...I can see her ankle lines....oh boy, oh boy...sorry gotta run and take a cold shower
"...The official doctrine of the LDS Church is a Global Flood" - BCSpace

"...What many people call sin is not sin." - Joseph Smith

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away" - Phillip K. Dick

“The meaning of life is that it ends" - Franz Kafka
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Son of Shoulder Porn

Post by _moksha »

Image
Students who cannot accept the
dress code should feel free to
leave the Utah Territory.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Son of Shoulder Porn

Post by _Themis »

cinepro wrote:I can understand the argument that having a dress code for toddlers and young children somehow "sexualizes" them, but I don't see how having a dress code for teenagers who are already living in a highly sexual culture somehow adds to that "sexualization". It seems entirely appropriate to have some standard of what is appropriate to wear to school, even if there might be some disagreement over what that standard is.


I think the problem here is a public school coming up with a dress standard from a particular religion. I can understand why people may not like a religions standard being forced on them. Should public schools in Afghanistan force burcas on all girls?
42
_Tator
_Emeritus
Posts: 3088
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:15 am

Re: Son of Shoulder Porn

Post by _Tator »

Craig Paxton wrote:
cinepro wrote: It seems entirely appropriate to have some standard of what is appropriate to wear to school, even if there might be some disagreement over what that standard is.



How bout these...they pretty much cover everything...guess we could call them Mormon Burkas Image Although the one to the right...seems a bit too revealing...I can see her ankle lines....oh boy, oh boy...sorry gotta run and take a cold shower


Sorry, it's a hot shower for me. I have x-ray vision and they are wearing split panties and peek-a-boo bras.
a.k.a. Pokatator joined Oct 26, 2006 and permanently banned from MAD Nov 6, 2006
"Stop being such a damned coward and use your real name to own your position."
"That's what he gets for posting in his own name."
2 different threads same day 2 hours apart Yohoo Bat 12/1/2015
_Fiannan
_Emeritus
Posts: 1253
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:25 pm

Re: Son of Shoulder Porn

Post by _Fiannan »

Simple solution. The reason women started shaving in the 20th Century was because clothing styles exposed the body. A backless cocktail dress just isn't as flattering if the gal has three inch underarm hair.

So since we are trying to get LDS gals to cover up then let's just promote the idea that when Paul was speaking of women not cutting the hair on their head that he meant hair on the body as well.

When LDS young women toss their razors then they will also toss their revealing blouses, dresses and shorts, not to mention swimming attire. Problem solved.
_Tator
_Emeritus
Posts: 3088
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:15 am

Re: Son of Shoulder Porn

Post by _Tator »

Fiannan wrote:Simple solution. The reason women started shaving in the 20th Century was because clothing styles exposed the body. A backless cocktail dress just isn't as flattering if the gal has three inch underarm hair.

So since we are trying to get LDS gals to cover up then let's just promote the idea that when Paul was speaking of women not cutting the hair on their head that he meant hair on the body as well.

When LDS young women toss their razors then they will also toss their revealing blouses, dresses and shorts, not to mention swimming attire. Problem solved.


OK just so they don't toss those split panties and peek-a-boo bras.
a.k.a. Pokatator joined Oct 26, 2006 and permanently banned from MAD Nov 6, 2006
"Stop being such a damned coward and use your real name to own your position."
"That's what he gets for posting in his own name."
2 different threads same day 2 hours apart Yohoo Bat 12/1/2015
_Bazooka
_Emeritus
Posts: 10719
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:36 am

Re: Son of Shoulder Porn

Post by _Bazooka »

Craig Paxton wrote:In the lastest attempt to sexualize high school students again a Utah school is imposing Mormon dress standards on their students... so the students decided to stage a walk out

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/58442 ... e.html.csp


When you think about it, Mormon dress standards are akin to blaming the banks for bank robberies because the money they store, and the way they store it, is simply too tempting to the robbers.
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: Son of Shoulder Porn

Post by _ludwigm »

Fiannan wrote:When LDS young women toss their razors ...
http://thoughtcatalog.com/dan-hoffman/2 ... -wig-nsfw/

As You check the link's URL, it is NSFW.
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
Post Reply