Page 8 of 8
Re: Thinking clearly about archaeology and the Book of Mormo
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 10:21 pm
by _Quasimodo
Bret Ripley wrote:GR33N wrote:Where do the verses say 'all other peoples' or 'all other nations'?
There can be little doubt that the land had been kept from the knowledge of Montenegro and Burundi. That's a Book of Mormon archaeological bulls-eye right there.
Despite being landlocked, there is NO evidence that Burundians (is that the correct collective?) did not build and sail boats to the Americas in the distant past.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Re: Thinking clearly about archaeology and the Book of Mormo
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 10:43 pm
by _Bret Ripley
Quasimodo wrote:Bret Ripley wrote:There can be little doubt that the land had been kept from the knowledge of Montenegro and Burundi. That's a Book of Mormon archaeological bulls-eye right there.
Despite being landlocked, there is NO evidence that Burundians (is that the correct collective?) did not build and sail boats to the Americas in the distant past.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Damn your eyes. Moldavia?
Re: Thinking clearly about archaeology and the Book of Mormo
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 11:09 pm
by _Quasimodo
Bret Ripley wrote:Quasimodo wrote:Despite being landlocked, there is NO evidence that Burundians (is that the correct collective?) did not build and sail boats to the Americas in the distant past.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Damn your eyes. Moldavia?
Too late!
As for Moldavia, this is an image of a stone tool from the Moldavian Plateau.
This is an image of a North American stone tool. Both are made of stone, both are kind of pointy. I rest my case.
