consiglieri wrote:One question.
Is Ralph Hancock Droopy?
The only differences between Droopy and Ralph are a college degree, a fake tan and a well-groomed full head of hair.
http://mormonstories.org/wp-content/upl ... 40x300.jpg
consiglieri wrote:One question.
Is Ralph Hancock Droopy?
why me wrote: Dan did a wonderful job defending the church which is one reason why critics reacted so strongly.
Doctor Scratch wrote:Just in case there are any of the "Mormon Studies" crowd reading this post:
you are going to be involved in a long, endless trench war with these guys. Yes, I realize that it's not really "nice"/"gentleman/womanly" to call these guys out, but if you don't, they're going to continue to claim that they were kicked out of the MI because you Mormon Studies folks want to "liberalize" the Church and destroy the historicity of the Book of Mormon. That's the way they're going to play this.
And for hell sakes, when you're both hunkered down on Christmas eve, come together and sing Silent Night, play a little soccer and film it for the sequel to Meet the Mormons.moksha wrote:Don't be caught like the HMS Hood under fire from the Bismark. Do something beside "batten down the hatches". If nothing else, brew up some chamomile tea and wait till they fire a loaded GA broadside for maximal damage, then return fire with an even more loaded GA.
Just don't go head to head with them. Those Classic FARMS guys are experts in hatchet throwing and all forms of guerrilla warfare. Stay out of the mud laced trenches and stick to the trebuchets on top of the Ivory Tower. Those cows from the BYU Creamery would make devastating ammo.
Doctor Scratch wrote:These days it is getting more and more difficult to determine what it is that the apologists want, exactly, besides revenge and the complete destruction of the new MI. They've got their journal; they get to say what they want; they've got their blogs. Do they want back in under the umbrella of respectability offered by BYU?
moksha wrote:Doctor Scratch wrote:Just in case there are any of the "Mormon Studies" crowd reading this post:
you are going to be involved in a long, endless trench war with these guys. Yes, I realize that it's not really "nice"/"gentleman/womanly" to call these guys out, but if you don't, they're going to continue to claim that they were kicked out of the MI because you Mormon Studies folks want to "liberalize" the Church and destroy the historicity of the Book of Mormon. That's the way they're going to play this.
Don't be caught like the HMS Hood under fire from the Bismark. Do something beside "batten down the hatches". If nothing else, brew up some chamomile tea and wait till they fire a loaded GA broadside for maximal damage, then return fire with an even more loaded GA.
Just don't go head to head with them. Those Classic FARMS guys are experts in hatchet throwing and all forms of guerrilla warfare. Stay out of the mud laced trenches and stick to the trebuchets on top of the Ivory Tower. Those cows from the BYU Creamery would make devastating ammo.
I love historical stories like that. History is so interesting to me... I guess that's why my faith came tumbling down, but as I was reading your narrative, all I could hear was Johnny Horton's "Gotta Sink The Bismark" in my ears.Chap wrote:Whether or not Holland was right to attack as he did on sighting the two German ships without waiting for other British ships to join him has been discussed. But it is unfair to a gallant commander to suggest that he was in any way caught and attacked unawares. Had that shell not hit where it did, more damage might have been caused to Bismark, and any chance of a breakout to the Atlantic eliminated there and then.
There has to be an MI-linked metaphor somewhere in all that ...
Zadok wrote:I love historical stories like that. History is so interesting to me... I guess that's why my faith came tumbling down, but as I was reading your narrative, all I could hear was Johnny Horton's "Gotta Sink The Bismark" in my ears.Chap wrote:Whether or not Holland was right to attack as he did on sighting the two German ships without waiting for other British ships to join him has been discussed. But it is unfair to a gallant commander to suggest that he was in any way caught and attacked unawares. Had that shell not hit where it did, more damage might have been caused to Bismark, and any chance of a breakout to the Atlantic eliminated there and then.
There has to be an MI-linked metaphor somewhere in all that ...
I did see that movie, and what's more, I saw it in England while I was there trying to convince the local citizenry that the One True Church of Jesus Christ had been restored to the Earth.Chap wrote:You've seen the film Sink the Bismark, right? Because it was a UK production, the credit for the destruction of the Bismark was not miraculously transferred to the armed forces of another country.
Zadok wrote:I did see that movie, and what's more, I saw it in England while I was there trying to convince the local citizenry that the One True Church of Jesus Christ had been restored to the Earth.Chap wrote:You've seen the film Sink the Bismark, right? Because it was a UK production, the credit for the destruction of the Bismark was not miraculously transferred to the armed forces of another country.
The fixation that the British People had on the events of "Their Finest Hour" was always interesting to me. 20 years after the war and it was still almost all they could talk about. I was young then, naïve, and didn't understand then, like I do now, the effects of trauma on a mind and soul.