Gorman wrote:Quasimodo wrote:There must be some sort of generic baptism for the dead. I think the vast majority of those that have ever lived on earth will remain totally unknown. The best genealogical research services in the world could only find a very small percentage of them. It seems unfair that only those with a name recorded in this life would qualify for the Celestial Kingdom.
In Mormon Theology, correcting the lack of names in physical records will take a large portion of the millennium.
Quasimodo wrote:How will that be done (no records)?
Good evening, I have a question.
Seeing as how we are pointing out the obvious flaws in the doctrinal premise for proxy ordinances....
Some time ago I was acting as the officiator at a session in the temple for a youth trip to do baptisms for the dead. Amongst the names done was one particular card for a deceased person called "Mary". There were some potential issues with this persons record. Firstly, the name "Mary" was the only information on the record card. No date of birth, no date of death, no parents, siblings, spouse etc. Nothing. Nada. Zilch. Just the one single word "Mary" There was no means to identify which particular Mary this was.
My question: Are there now a group of Marys in the afterlife squabbling over who's proxy baptism that was? If there is a means of correcting this in the afterlife, that would render the necessity of performing the symbolic gesture in this life null and void. At least in terms of the necessity for the dead person.
I have long maintained that temple work for the dead is not for the dead, it serves a purpose for the Church in terms of the living. The realization that so many names will have been missed, so many ordinances done incorrectly (wrong spellings, wrong dates, duplications etc) means that, if the doctrine is correct, there must needs be a method for actioning baptisms for dead people in some other post-life manner for the plan and purpose to be fulfilled. On that basis, that dead people can receive baptism in some other way, temple work is unnecessary as far as the dead person is concerned.
Also, one of the levers used to coerce members to do temple work is that these dead people are anxiously waiting for these ordinances to be done. If this life is the blinking of an eye eternally (as Mormon doctrine teaches) then they are hardly waiting anytime at all, right? And from an eternal perspective for that dead person, if it's done today or next month or next year is, eternally speaking, pretty much the exact same thing. So no rush.
Did I mention that the person "Mary" whose baptism was performed posthumously that evening was registered on a blue card (representing a male) and was therefore represented baptismly by a teenage boy? So how's that work out in the long run if that baptism supposedly counts and was necessary?