ldsfaqs wrote:
Well, clearly it's a story recorded by someone (pretty detailed by the way), thus it's in the history.
As to the claim that Law would have been tried for attempted murder, well..... things worked differently in those days, and Joseph was forgiving.
I don't remember near anyone tried for anything of the things they did against Joseph, the tar and feathering, various assualts, various crimes against members of the church, etc.
So, that's not a good argument.
Just because something seems detailed doesn't make it so. There is no date for this "story". Nothing to allow anyone to verify it. It is simply a late "recollection" and an invented diary entry. EA made a great argument. => As for Joseph not trying anyone, Charles Foster pulled a pistol on Smith in May of 1844 and Smith immediately had him arrested and fined him for doing so.
Charles Foster drew a pistol towards me on the steps of my office. I ordered him to be arrested and the pistol taken from him. A struggle ensued in which Charles Foster, R[obert] D. Foster and Chaunc[e]y L. Higbee resisted and I ordered them to be arrested. They resisted and I Mayor ordered the High policemen to be called and his possey and went on to try A[ugustus]. Spencer. Fined him $100 bound for to keep the peace 6 months. (Scott H. Faulring, An American Prophet's Record, p.474)
[p.345] Robert D. Foster, Charles Foster and Chauncey L. Higbee were each fined $100. They immediately took an appeal to the Municipal Court. (Joseph Smith, History of the Church, Vol. 6, p.345)
If Law had done the same thing and pulled the trigger, Joseph would have had him arrested. The proof is right there ^^^^^^