DiscussMormonism.com

ldsfaqs wrote:Further, I can distinguish just fine, though I've never actually seen an M60 myself up close, and I don't pay attention anyway. Again, that gun was before my time.

You're a pig, and a liar. I joined in the mid 90's and M60's were still in use. Marines would've used them. In fact, the damn thing is still in use across the services.

God. You just don't know when to quit. I'm out I'm still in since he waffled and posted a pjc of someone.

- Doc

SteelHead wrote:Some one correct me... but the term used was "exactly the same".

Here it is:

almost the same exact design, just one is smaller.

.

The m4 is a smaller version of the m16 and shares a number of parts. The saw and m60 share nothing.

I will correct you.... I said they look "almost" exactly the same from the beginning, having a "similar" design.
I NEVER said exactly the same, that's anti-mormon reading comprehension as usual making that leap into neverland false judgementalism.
I never did say they "shared" anything.... Doesn't mean they don't look and function similar.

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:

ldsfaqs wrote:Further, I can distinguish just fine, though I've never actually seen an M60 myself up close, and I don't pay attention anyway. Again, that gun was before my time.

You're a pig, and a liar. I joined in the mid 90's and M60's were still in use. Marines would've used them. In fact, the damn thing is still in use across the services.

God. You just don't know when to quit. I'm out.

- Doc

Classic.... I show the proof, and yet I'm STILL a pig and a liar huh huh....

I said "I" never used it. I never said it didn't exist anymore.
I used a LOT of different guns, just not that one.

Sorry you can't admit being wrong.

Full quote :

And as to the SAW compared with the M60E3, you clearly don't know what you're talking about, because they are almost the same exact design, just one is smaller. Only looking at one close-up would one see the minor differences between the two.

You say that the design is the same and that there are slight visual differences. This is different from "look the same".

SteelHead wrote:Full quote :

And as to the SAW compared with the M60E3, you clearly don't know what you're talking about, because they are almost the same exact design, just one is smaller. Only looking at one close-up would one see the minor differences between the two.

You say that the design is the same and that there are slight visual differences. This is different from "look the same".

Seriously? Now I have to teach you guys basic English?

Having an almost same exact design refers to several aspects, how they feed, the styling of the gun, location of things, etc.
Yes, they have almost the same exact design, thus they DO in fact "almost look the same".
Like I said, the SAW is the baby brother of the M60, and it was specifically designed to be so.

Again, while there is some noticable differences, they DO look alot alike having noticable similarity's.
Again also, the SAW has the same middle handle grip as the M60, and the M60 also has the same top handle, it's just either turned or removed in that pic.

DrW wrote:No one seriously doubts that ldsfaqs has been lying. Perhaps we should just go ahead and let ldsfaqs have the last word on the subject (because he will have the last word - no matter how long it takes), and move on.

If folks reading the last few pages of this thread have not made up their minds as to ldsfaqs' veracity on the issue by now, I doubt that more commentary will help them do so.

And yet, I always prove you guys the liars and you all just ignore it.....
In fact, I'm going to do it yet again, just to show you people how truly arrogant, petty, slimeball, etc. you ALL are, the LENGTHS you all go to in your complete fantasy's of people, the lengths you will lie about people and things, falsely degrade, etc.

Here's your proof.... Now stick it. haa haa



Note the Cross Rifles? Expert Marksman.
In fact, the marine in training who won the Company high Marksmanship was in my Platoon, and he just barely beat me out.
I think also the only reason he beat me was because I was just starting to lose my eyesight, had to "squint" the test to get 20/20 out of it. So, his eyesight was likely better in seeing the real long distances, the lines.

SuperDell wrote:ldsfaqs wrote:

If you all have such the need, post a thread about whether I was a Marine or not.....

It is the "was" that really calls into question your veracity.

Once a Marine, always a Marine. Not "was a marine".

Dr. Shades refers to himself as an ex-Marine. Does he need to post a pic in uniform, too?

Well, at least Mr. Faqs posted a picture of someone! It's a start!

- Doc

ldsfaqs wrote:

DrW wrote:No one seriously doubts that ldsfaqs has been lying. Perhaps we should just go ahead and let ldsfaqs have the last word on the subject (because he will have the last word - no matter how long it takes), and move on.

If folks reading the last few pages of this thread have not made up their minds as to ldsfaqs' veracity on the issue by now, I doubt that more commentary will help them do so.

And yet, I always prove you guys the liars and you all just ignore it.....
In fact, I'm going to do it yet again, just to show you people how truly arrogant, petty, slimeball, etc. you ALL are, the LENGTHS you all go to in your complete fantasy's of people, the lengths you will lie about people and things, falsely degrade, etc.

Here's your proof.... Now stick it. haa haa



Note the Cross Rifles? Expert Marksman.
In fact, the marine in training who won the Company high Marksmanship was in my Platoon, and he just barely beat me out.
I think also the only reason he beat me was because I was just starting to lose my eyesight, had to "squint" the test to get 20/20 out of it. So, his eyesight was likely better in seeing the real long distances, the lines.

Just for the written record here, I think you know I dislike most of what you post or more accurately, I dislike your presentation. That is to say, your writing skills generally suck.

That said, I think it's pretty effing low for people to question that you served in the military.

ldsfaqs wrote:

This one is my favorite. Thank you for your service, faqs.