Brother Rappleye was absolutely indispensable this past summer as he put forth a monumental effort towards defeating Philip Jenkins's arguments. Indeed, Jenkins himself had praise for Rappleye:
Philip Jenkins wrote:I have had a couple of exchanges with Neal Rappleye in the past. Then as now, he strikes me as smart and literate.
But there was criticism, too:
Jenkins wrote:I am no less struck by the puzzling disconnect between the articulate nature of what he writes, and the startling lack of sophistication of his arguments. By far his weakest spot concerns his use of far-fetched and wildly unconvincing analogies, which instantly destroy the credibility of his arguments – more on that shortly. This may all reflect the fact that Book of Mormon apologists really never engage with mainstream scholars. Virtually no mainstream academic takes his cause seriously enough to be worth arguing with, so an apologist never has an opportunity to test his/her arguments in that setting.
Hence why we have Neal to thank for providing us with this crucial insight into the Mopologetic endeavor. Ultimately, of course, Rappleye had to beat a hasty retreat. Even though he was using the best weapons that had been provided to him by Gardner, Hamblin, Tvedtnes, and others, he finally wound up having to concede:
Neal Rappleye wrote:And if a "distinguished professor" writing in a bombastic style, with a healthy dose of snark and mockery directed at one's religious beliefs, critiquing a student who hasn't even finished he undergraduate work, who isn't really trying to "debate" him in the first place can impress you, then you have a pretty low standards for what you will be impressed with.
Is it possible that we would have been more impressed if Peterson, Midgley, Gardner and others had jumped into the fray? Possibly. But it was Neal Rappleye who did it--with brio--and for that reason he is the winner of the 2015 Sampson Avard Golden Scepter Award. I hope you'll join me in giving him a laudatory round of applause!