sock puppet wrote:mentalgymnast wrote:There were a lot of players active at the time that Joseph was being accused of moral bankruptcy in Nauvoo. It is difficult using primary sources to pin down what really was going on. Some of the sources are antagonistic. Some are not. Where do you draw the line between what can be trusted as 'the truth' and what is not? For example, are John C. Bennett and Sarah Brotherton to be trusted? When is William Law to be trusted and when is he not? The Fosters? And so forth.
Regards,
MG
When is JSJr to be trusted? and WHY?
Do you see answering a question(s) with a question as an effective strategy?
I've seen this more than once. Apparently there is something being accomplished in choosing to approach questions being asked through this form of circumvention?
I believe that the links I provided show that there was more going on than meets the eye at first glance. One little quote that Zeezrom posted that is used over and over again to prove...something?
When one reads the surrounding pages around the quote it doesn't take long to see that things are a bit more involved/messy than simple and straightforward.
Regards,
MG