Maksutov wrote:ldsfaqs wrote:I don't know why you people think the Church's job is to be "lie detectors".
It's not.
The only "standard" the Church employ's is to take people at their word unless they have evidence and testimony otherwise.
So, what part of this is "lie detecting" to you people?
Discernment is a very specialized and unique gift, and it's entirely up to God to give it, and the person's ability to recieve it.
Further, you have no clue the amount of times the power of discernment works, but the leader can't do or say anything about it unless they have specific evidence. In other words, it would often be inappropriate for them to ask someone if they are a man, or ask a person if they are a child molester..... It's not like they are going to "admit it", and such amounts to an accusation without PROOF.
So, stop being bigots..... People "discern" all the time, and it doesn't just happen in the Church, yet there are many factors involved.
President David O. McKay promised every man who uses the priesthood in righteousness that he “will find his life sweetened, his discernment sharpened to decide quickly between right and wrong, his feelings tender and compassionate, yet his spirit strong and valiant in defense of right; he will find the priesthood a never failing source of happiness—a well of living water springing up unto eternal life” (Teachings of Presidents of the Church: David O. McKay [2003], 116).
https://www.lds.org/manual/gospel-princ ... d?lang=eng
Discerning right and wrong in the context of that statement is more so WITHIN ONESELF..... not outside of it.
God doesn't generally reveal the "heart" and character of someone else, save a specialized few. But even then someone can be good but have a sinful nature, thus it's still extremely specialized.