Franktalk wrote: ... The world and our bodies are not designed to provide proof or evidence. So please reject everything I say. It just does not matter.
It's not so much a matter of rejecting, but of wondering why you think anybody might profit from reading and adopting your opinions on the weighty matters about which you habitually offer us information.
Presumably you are not just sitting in front of your computer saying to yourself "What kind of portentously mystical stuff can I make up today ... oh yeah, that'll do ... hit the 'Submit' button'. So you must have some reason for thinking that the things you write are, on the whole, likely to be true.
What is that reason?
Further, I think it very, very unlikely that you make the important practical decisions of everyday life - such as which used car to choose, or where to invest your retirement funds - without looking at all the evidence you can gather and evaluating it as carefully as you can. I bet you don't just walk up to the sales lot saying "The world and our bodies are not designed to provide proof or evidence" - no, you look to see if there is rust under the chassis, you check on social media to see if that particular dealer is suspected of winding back the mileage on his vehicles, and so on.
Our eternal destiny, if we have one (personally I don't think we have) would be infinitely more important than a used car. You tell us, very confidently:
The only one who judges us when we die is ourselves. There is no hell, there is no punishment.
But if you are wrong about that, and Jack Chick is right, we are in for big, big trouble:

So again, how do you know you are right?