ldsfaqs wrote:His book is absolutely no different than any other scientific work or of scholarship I have read in all kinds of areas.
Well ... there it is.
ldsfaqs wrote:His book is absolutely no different than any other scientific work or of scholarship I have read in all kinds of areas.
Bret Ripley wrote:ldsfaqs wrote:His book is absolutely no different than any other scientific work or of scholarship I have read in all kinds of areas.
Well ... there it is.
sr1030 wrote:The Nahom supposed evidence for the Book of Mormon was absolutely debunked many years ago. I located maps that were available to any writer of the Book of Mormon and provided evidence that these maps were available. Warren Aston has yet to respond to this, only people like S Kent Brown who made a complete fool of himself by stating that it would be the responsibility of an accuser to show that Joseph Smith had access to these maps and also a book by Carsten Niebuhr. Why is this still being discussed? Do defenders of Joseph Smith still think we need to show that these materials were in the hands of Joseph Smith? What if we don't believe Joseph Smith wrote the Book of Mormon?
sr
DonBradley wrote:I don't truly envy Warren Aston, because that would require me to have a much lower standard of evidence and believe in a lot of things that probably ain't so. But to engage in similarly venturesome quests on a better evidentiary footing would be incredibly cool.
Don