Page 4 of 6
Re: Doc Shades, copycat alert, the board name is being used.
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:20 pm
by _Jersey Girl
Just for the record here, there was a similar concern on this board when FAIR turned into MAD.
Doesn't anyone remember that? What, do I have savant level memory skills?
Re: Doc Shades, copycat alert, the board name is being used.
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:25 pm
by _toon
Polygamy-Porter wrote:Oh reely fence sitter??
It's far more complicated than that.
How far would this new and improved Mormon President DB go with that?
Would he allow legally gay couples full membership? Even being sealed in the temple??
Would he allow women to be priesthood holders?
Would he call women to be bishops, stake presidents, and even Apostles???
Would he allow unwed fornicating couples to have full membership?
Would he allow members to give talk on how they oppose certain portions of the theology?
The list is as long as the day.
Based on my interactions with Bill, I suspect he'd say "yes" to all of those questions.
Re: Doc Shades, copycat alert, the board name is being used.
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:32 pm
by _Dr. Shades
Jersey Girl wrote:Just for the record here, there was a similar concern on this board when FAIR turned into MAD.
No, it was when MAD turned into MD&D.
Re: Doc Shades, copycat alert, the board name is being used.
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:44 pm
by _Jersey Girl
Dr. Shades wrote:Jersey Girl wrote:Just for the record here, there was a similar concern on this board when FAIR turned into MAD.
No, it was when MAD turned into MD&D.
I sit corrected!
:-)
Re: Doc Shades, copycat alert, the board name is being used.
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 8:11 pm
by _Quasimodo
Jersey Girl wrote:I sit corrected!
:-)
I'm sorry to hear that! Some sort of back brace?
Re: Doc Shades, copycat alert, the board name is being used.
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 8:42 pm
by _Jersey Girl
Quasimodo wrote:Jersey Girl wrote:I sit corrected!
:-)
I'm sorry to hear that! Some sort of back brace?
Not yet!
Re: Doc Shades, copycat alert, the board name is being used.
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:46 pm
by _Fence Sitter
Polygamy-Porter wrote:Oh reely fence sitter??
It's far more complicated than that.
How far would this new and improved Mormon President DB go with that?
Would he allow legally gay couples full membership? Even being sealed in the temple??
Would he allow women to be priesthood holders?
Would he call women to be bishops, stake presidents, and even Apostles???
Would he allow unwed fornicating couples to have full membership?
Would he allow members to give talk on how they oppose certain portions of the theology?
The list is as long as the day.
I cannot speak to specifics as to what Bill would and would not change. Ask him. But I suspect that many of the items on your list would be fine by him. I just know from my interactions with him and from what I have read and heard about/by him, I would be comfortable attending church where people who acted like him were in charge.
Hey, you got to like anyone who pisses Yahoo Bot off on a regular basis.
Re: Doc Shades, copycat alert, the board name is being used.
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm
by _Polygamy-Porter
Fence Sitter wrote:I cannot speak to specifics as to what Bill would and would not change. Ask him.
I did
here.
Hey, you got to like anyone who pisses Yahoo Bot off on a regular basis.
True.
Bob is easy to provoke.
Re: Doc Shades, copycat alert, the board name is being used.
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 10:11 pm
by _DBMORMON
Dr. Shades wrote:Polygamy-Porter wrote:
He dropped the s and added podcast.org
DBMORMON, why did you choose your site's name to be so similar to ours?
No. It was independent of such and so happens to be similar. I registered here Tue Dec 01, 2015 several years after starting the podcast. To be honest I didn't know about this board for a while.
my podcast started in 2012.
Re: Doc Shades, copycat alert, the board name is being used.
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 10:15 pm
by _DBMORMON
Polygamy-Porter wrote:Oh reely fence sitter??
It's far more complicated than that.
How far would this new and improved Mormon President DB go with that?
Would he allow legally gay couples full membership? Even being sealed in the temple??
Would he allow women to be priesthood holders?
Would he call women to be bishops, stake presidents, and even Apostles???
Would he allow unwed fornicating couples to have full membership?
Would he allow members to give talk on how they oppose certain portions of the theology?
The list is as long as the day.
have you ever been institutionalized? I can't imagine finding someone as aggressive as you out in the dark dreary world and getting along
gays sealed.... hmmm. i am open to it. Would love to have the conversation with God if I was in charge and see what his reasons are for not doing so.
I would certainly seek ways to be more gender equal.... not sure what that would mean.
Women at top levels.... I am open to having a conversation
unwed fornicators..... are they kinder then you? do they allow you full fellowship? i mean being an ass seems much worse.
I would allow members to talk more about perspectives where it is outside the doctrine of Christ.