Can anyone explain "grace" Mormon style?
God only has so much magic to go around and that is why He needs you to supplement it with tithing and Temple ordinances. Together they make grace so amazing and exaltifying.
Can anyone explain "grace" Mormon style?
I have just updated that blog post again, by the way, to add more information to it on the Mormon doctrine of salvation, if you are interested.kairos wrote:thanx so much for your link-very informative for me!zerinus wrote:I have already answered that question in my latest Blog post which you can see here:
http://zerinus.blogspot.co.uk/2017/03/g ... opics.html
I have just updated it to more fully answer your specific question.
SPG wrote:Grace started out in the ancient world as a method of separating God's people from the heathens. The idea of pre-destination was more or less the deciding factor of who was saved and who was not. Basically, if you were a Hebrew, you were saved, if not. . . .
Then the Christians came along and wanted to be part of the Hebrew religion, but were not Jews. They extended to themselves the idea of Grace, Salvation by means of adoption into the Jewish religion.
Mixed with ancient Greek ideals, there was debate between Salvation by Works and Salvation by Grace. By Works, obviously meant you have to work for your salvation, do good deeds, be a good person, etc. Grace still allowed someone to be saved just by being in the right church.
The LDS church a mix of this. Obviously, you have to be in the church to be saved by Grace, but you also have to be a good a person. Debates still rage about whether or not Grace alone can save us.
Some say that the Grace of God is enough, some say it isn't. This is key to the ideals of whether God is a Just and whether he is all powerful. Can God save anyone, or . . . . . will God save everyone, if so, why and why not?
To me, Grace is a force of nature and always comes in the form of a gift. Never is it earned, but always is it available. Worthiness is based on readiness of our condition, not the favor of our superiors.
But one major application of Grace, IMHO, is the Devil. He does not tempt us, but rather holds back the instant consequences of our actions. Our "demons" are the result of misdeeds and ignorance that are held back until we are ready to deal with them. They seem ugly and scary to us, because they are our fear. These guys are "managed" for us until we can face them and put them to rest. They are soulless energy, often filled with pain and suffering.
Grace is about life (God) doing 99% of the work of living, but allowing us a 1% percent chance of expressing ourselves and developing our soul.
SPG wrote:Grace started out in the ancient world as a method of separating God's people from the heathens. The idea of pre-destination was more or less the deciding factor of who was saved and who was not. Basically, if you were a Hebrew, you were saved, if not. . . .
Then the Christians came along and wanted to be part of the Hebrew religion, but were not Jews. They extended to themselves the idea of Grace, Salvation by means of adoption into the Jewish religion.
Mixed with ancient Greek ideals, there was debate between Salvation by Works and Salvation by Grace. By Works, obviously meant you have to work for your salvation, do good deeds, be a good person, etc. Grace still allowed someone to be saved just by being in the right church.
The LDS church a mix of this. Obviously, you have to be in the church to be saved by Grace, but you also have to be a good a person. Debates still rage about whether or not Grace alone can save us.
Some say that the Grace of God is enough, some say it isn't. This is key to the ideals of whether God is a Just and whether he is all powerful. Can God save anyone, or . . . . . will God save everyone, if so, why and why not?
To me, Grace is a force of nature and always comes in the form of a gift. Never is it earned, but always is it available. Worthiness is based on readiness of our condition, not the favor of our superiors.
But one major application of Grace, IMHO, is the Devil. He does not tempt us, but rather holds back the instant consequences of our actions. Our "demons" are the result of misdeeds and ignorance that are held back until we are ready to deal with them. They seem ugly and scary to us, because they are our fear. These guys are "managed" for us until we can face them and put them to rest. They are soulless energy, often filled with pain and suffering.
Grace is about life (God) doing 99% of the work of living, but allowing us a 1% percent chance of expressing ourselves and developing our soul.
kairos wrote:I lean to the evangelical cooperation theory scenario with faith not being a work , thus it's all grace!
comments??
k
SPG wrote:kairos wrote:I lean to the evangelical cooperation theory scenario with faith not being a work , thus it's all grace!
comments??
k
God is unchanging. When the heretics, (Christians) wanted to join the Hebrew faith, the Jews rejected the idea because God doesn't change.
I believe that God doesn't change, however, I accept that I don't understand everything about God.
I believe that God is Living Truth, sort of like Biological Law, but for living everything law. The truth doesn't change, but how "I SEE" the truth changes all the time.
Here-in lies the biggest element of Grace. I thought things sucked, but as I learned, I realized that they didn't suck. I thought I was damned, but as I looked again, I realized there was a path to the light for me.
When we think we understand God, thus know the truth, we actually cut ourselves off God's Grace. When we are humble, allowing that we make mistakes, that we can be wrong, then God's Grace begins to embrace us. It's always there, the truth of it, but we cannot touch it because of our own stubbornness.
When you accept the cool things about God, that he is loving, kind, forgiving, just, etc, then we can begin to admit we don't understand.
Me, I am both Calvinist and Evangelist. The Grace is there, in an eternal, infinite sort of way. But if you don't reach for it, you will never have it.
Nightlion wrote:Kairos why entreat me and engage me not?