OK I'm Going to be Honest, I am Miffed!

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: OK I'm Going to be Honest, I am Miffed!

Post by _Maksutov »

zerinus wrote:
Philo Sofee wrote:You forgot to say it is by the holy spirit that those Christians know Mormonism is false and that Joseph Smith is a false prophet and that the Book of Mormon is phony as well. That's their evidence against you. Now what are you going to do about that? Because obviously God tells them that you are wrong by the same manner that you claim you are right.
Actually they don't (or rarely do). The great majority of Christians in the world are not interested in the controversy between Mormons and the critics in any case. The "anti-Mormon" community are usually people who have an axe to grind, so their criticisms lack objectivity. But having said that, even in those cases, the great majority of those who criticise Mormons do so precisely on the grounds that Mormons rely on their "feelings" to determine the truth, while they use objective criteria like archaeology, text criticism, or DNA etc. What Mormons call "testimony of the Holy Ghost," they disparagingly call "feelings". These for the most part are neither objective critics, nor even genuine Christians. They are most often Mormon apostates who have an axe to grind.


What you call "anti-Mormons" are ex-Mormons who have exposed the lies and frauds of Smith. We speak from knowledge and experience, which is why you can't handle us, you can only duck and dodge and diss. This has been the case since the early days of the church. Rather than address the issues, you will whine about persecution. You try to deflect all criticism with ignorant kneejerk rejections. It won't work.

Many of us were believers, Z-boy. Many of us felt the prescribed feelings and trusted people and read the books they told us to. When we found out that we were lied to, that we had worshiped a hoax, many of us became agitated. As we should. You are willing to dismiss that because you don't face us in person, you get to hide behind an avatar. We are real people who have suffered real losses and pain connected with the church. And if you don't like to hear our stories, that's just too bad. :wink:

Axe to grind? What about a failed religion writer who goes to forums and preaches but won't discuss? What's your axe, Z-boy? You can't get a real publisher and the Mormons aren't interested in you? You'll never make the shelves at Deseret Book and you'll never stand among the Brethren at GC? You're just a pawn who parades his pathetic worship of the church as if it were a virtue or a tool for life. It is neither. Mormonism has given us polygamy, subversive organizations, pseudohistory, pseudoscience and repressive politics. Mormonism in its current form is deeply incompatible with democracy, freedom and science. Perhaps that's why it appeals to you. :lol:
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: OK I'm Going to be Honest, I am Miffed!

Post by _Gadianton »

Z wrote:You insist that I "prove" to you that there is a God, whereas for me that is not an issue; or that I "prove" to you that the Book of Mormon is true


CFR: Where have I ever insisted you prove there is a God or that the Book of Mormon is true? I think you're fantasizing -- you're reading a lot into the posts others write to find stereotypical behaviors the Book of Mormon teaches about -- Korihor asking of signs and proofs etc.

Z wrote:I haven't seen much intelligent debate and discussion coming out of here....The reason why I don't engage in a lot of debate with people round here is because we don't have a lot in common


Not sure you serve as much of a judge. About the only corner of human knowledge you've shown facility with is the LDS standard works. Okay, you call yourself a scriptorian and you do seem to know the scriptures pretty well, but in superficial, scripture-chase terms. Perhaps you could be considered a knowledgeable proof-texter?

I doubt you get very far with non-LDS bible-believers either but I'm open to be proven wrong. Could you link to a scholarly, intelligent online discussion you've had on another forum that you really felt went somewhere important? Show us an example of what intelligent discussion is all about, Zerinus.

There isn't much for me to do about your claim that you know the Book of Mormon is true other than to present arguments as to why you should not be taken seriously. The problem with moonlighting as a theologian who relies on testimony as the most heavily wielded rhetorical tool in your tool shed, is that it counts against the credibility of your own alleged testimony. Because you don't think a testimony can be countered in logical terms (I have a testimony, what are you going to do about it, har, har, har!) you have a significant vested interest in claiming to have a testimony whether you believe you have one or not. It's one of the dangers of representing the inside and outside of a narrative at the same time and you don't even try to walk the line gracefully.

Oversights like this tell me you wouldn't do very well in debate or serious discussion no matter what the common ground is, although, I welcome you to prove me wrong and link to an example of Zarinus having a productive discussion or winning a debate at another forum with more common ground.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: OK I'm Going to be Honest, I am Miffed!

Post by _Lemmie »

Gadianton wrote:
Z wrote:I haven't seen much intelligent debate and discussion coming out of here....The reason why I don't engage in a lot of debate with people round here is because we don't have a lot in common

I doubt you get very far with non-LDS bible-believers either but I'm open to be proven wrong. Could you link to a scholarly, intelligent online discussion you've had on another forum that you really felt went somewhere important? Show us an example of what intelligent discussion is all about, Zerinus.

...Oversights like this tell me you wouldn't do very well in debate or serious discussion no matter what the common ground is, although, I welcome you to prove me wrong and link to an example of Zarinus having a productive discussion or winning a debate at another forum with more common ground.

That would be great if he could illustrate, at the moment the only evidence given of his very long-standing negative debating reputation in non-lds religious forums is this, posted in an earlier thread:
Catholic Answers Forum poster, 2009, wrote:Frankly, Z[erinus] has demonstrated repeatedly over the years that he cannot be trusted to evaluate issues and reliably convey facts. In fact, I would not even consider him a credible source about the teachings and practices of the LDS church either.

Instead he attempts to creates conflict where there is none, and holds himself and the LDS church out to be victims of a cruel world whose primary, even singular, goal is to persecute the LDS Church. Such a warped approach will only result in error. Which we see repeatedly.
http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=364062

From: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=44869&p=1029839&hilit=zerinus%2C+catholic#p1029839
_Xenophon
_Emeritus
Posts: 1823
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 7:50 pm

Re: OK I'm Going to be Honest, I am Miffed!

Post by _Xenophon »

Lemmie wrote:That would be great if he could illustrate, at the moment the only evidence given of his very long-standing negative debating reputation in non-lds religious forums is this, posted in an earlier thread:
Catholic Answers Forum poster, 2009, wrote:Frankly, Z[erinus] has demonstrated repeatedly over the years that he cannot be trusted to evaluate issues and reliably convey facts. In fact, I would not even consider him a credible source about the teachings and practices of the LDS church either.

Instead he attempts to creates conflict where there is none, and holds himself and the LDS church out to be victims of a cruel world whose primary, even singular, goal is to persecute the LDS Church. Such a warped approach will only result in error. Which we see repeatedly.
http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=364062

From: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=44869&p=1029839&hilit=zerinus%2C+catholic#p1029839


After going back through some old threads in 2012 the similarities between zerinus and a poster by the name of "jskains" are amusing to me. How quickly he can dismiss any interpretation other than his own, his attempts at reading between the lines while subsequently being mad when you read him at face value and of course the claim to victim status.

I guess these kinds of posters are just cyclical in nature.

One excellent example from times gone by: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=23916

In that thread, a very familiar line:
jskains wrote:
Buffalo wrote:Actually, all the evidence for sexual congress originates from LDS sources. I told you you didn't know much about polygamy.

The adultery started shortly after the publication of the Book of Mormon. The swindling started long before its publication.



You must not have a real argument if all you can do is act like a child.

You have been put on ignore.

JMS
"If you consider what are called the virtues in mankind, you will find their growth is assisted by education and cultivation." -Xenophon of Athens
_zerinus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1858
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:45 pm

Re: OK I'm Going to be Honest, I am Miffed!

Post by _zerinus »

Gadianton wrote:CFR: Where have I ever insisted you prove there is a God or that the Book of Mormon is true? . . .
I was not referring to you specifically, but making a general observation.

Not sure you serve as much of a judge. About the only corner of human knowledge you've shown facility with is the LDS standard works. . . .
If the discussion is on Mormon doctrine, then that is the most reliable source of information. A theological discussion will always be focused on scripture.

Okay, you call yourself a scriptorian . . .
I don’t call myself anything.

I doubt you get very far with non-LDS bible-believers either but I'm open to be proven wrong. Could you link to a scholarly, intelligent online discussion you've had on another forum that you really felt went somewhere important? Show us an example of what intelligent discussion is all about, Zerinus.
I have been discussing Mormonism on message boards on the internet for years. I have clocked up around 10,000 posts on CARM since 2012, and I have been around message boards on the Internet a lot longer than that. How good they have been will have depended on the seriousness​ of the other side. But your idea of a good discussion will likely be different from mine. I haven’t been posting much on CARM lately party because CARM has gotten boring, and partly because I have been paying more attention to my blog lately.

There isn't much for me to do about your claim that you know the Book of Mormon is true other than to present arguments as to why you should not be taken seriously.
I figured.

The problem with moonlighting as a theologian who relies on testimony as the most heavily wielded rhetorical tool in your tool shed, is that it counts against the credibility of your own alleged testimony. . . .
It becomes the “most heavily wielded rhetorical tool” in places like this, where people can’t go beyond demanding that I “prove” to them that the Church is true, or to “prove” to them that God exists, etc. Serious theological discussion becomes possible when people can get beyond that. Look at my latest blogs for good examples.

Oversights like this tell me you wouldn't do very well in debate or serious discussion no matter what the common ground is, although, I welcome you to prove me wrong and link to an example of zerinus having a productive discussion or winning a debate at another forum with more common ground.
LOL! I win all of my debates where there is a common ground. I have not lost one yet. :lol:
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: OK I'm Going to be Honest, I am Miffed!

Post by _Themis »

zerinus wrote:
Themis wrote:How do you say it's not about similar beliefs and then argue you need similar beliefs? :confused: If you disagree with the assumptions of astronomers they can still have a discussion with you about why you disagree with them. You avoid those kind of questions put to you here about how you know the church is true.
I know the Church is true because the Spirit of God bears witness to me that it is true. That is how Christians in general know that there is a God who has spoken to us in the Bible.


They don't believe God told you that. Many may believe God told them the church is not true just as God told them the Bible is the word of God. What's funny in asking you to tell us how you know something, is the church doesn't mind explaining it in their manuals, conference talks, scriptures, etc. We already know how you think you know and the many problems with it. Most here have been there. We know the problems of many Christians and other religions thinking they know something from God even though they disagree with each other. You spend time arguing with Christians who think they are right, and you wrong, in the same way you think you are right. It would suggest a real problem to an open mind.
42
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: OK I'm Going to be Honest, I am Miffed!

Post by _Lemmie »

z wrote:LOL! I win all of my debates where there is a common ground. I have not lost one yet. : lol:

That's exactly what ldsfaqs says! He never actually engages in debate either, so I can see the similarity.
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: OK I'm Going to be Honest, I am Miffed!

Post by _Maksutov »

The Z at work:

Image

This also captured his girly man quality. :lol:
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_Philo Sofee
_Emeritus
Posts: 6660
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:04 am

Re: OK I'm Going to be Honest, I am Miffed!

Post by _Philo Sofee »

Zerinus
LOL! I win all of my debates where there is a common ground. I have not lost one yet. :lol:
zerinus
I am a Mormon!
http://amazon.com/author/bijhan
User avatar
zerinus
Prophet

Posts: 854
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 12:45 pm
LOL! I win all of my debates where there is a common ground. I have not lost one yet. :lol:


And what have you ever proved that causes anyone of us to accept your belief? In other words what's the net result of you totally having a 100% win streak in every debate you've ever had?
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: OK I'm Going to be Honest, I am Miffed!

Post by _Gadianton »

Z wrote:I was not referring to you specifically, but making a general observation.


Okay, then please cite where a member of this forum demands you to prove God exists. I haven't followed all of your posts, but I don't recall ever seeing a forum member here demanding that you prove God exists.

Z wrote:I don’t call myself anything.


http://mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3/vie ... 9&start=84

Zerinus wrote:I am a scriptorian.


Are you sure you don't call yourself a scriptorian?

Z wrote:I have clocked up around 10,000 posts on CARM since 2012, and I have been around message boards on the Internet a lot longer than that. How good they have been will have depended on the seriousness​ of the other side. But your idea of a good discussion will likely be different from mine.


10,000+ posts eh? Please link to an example of what you think was a good discussion. Surely in what, 15,000+ posts over your multi-decade career on message boards spent primarily among others who believe the Bible, you can back up your own claim and cite a single example where you either did well in a debate or had a productive discussion? My idea of a good discussion may or may not be different than yours, who knows. I can appreciate when good points are made on topics I don't personally find interesting and I see believers make good points against non-believers all the time.

I'll admit your prospects aren't looking great considering that post Lemmie has from the Catholic forum but you know your own posting history better than anyone -- it's your chance to prove Lemmie wrong.

Basically, you're in a fork right now. If 15k+ posts and two decades can't produce a single good example of a discussion because the "other side wasn't serious enough" then you had no ground to stand on when you said the criteria for a good discussion and debate is having some kind of common ground such as the Bible. And if the Bible as common ground is good enough for a good discussion, then the onus is on you to risk embarrassment and offer but one example from your extensive posting history to back up your case.

Taking a step back here, Zerinus, the fact you allowed yourself to be put into this fork so readily tells me it's unlikely you have many "good discussions" or debates out there or are capable of seriously debating or discussing anything. We can stay a thousand miles away from proofs of God or the Book of Mormon and see you quickly get out of your depth.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
Post Reply