We have the smoothest liars in the world - B. Young

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_JLHPROF
_Emeritus
Posts: 445
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 1:44 am

Re: We have the smoothest liars in the world - B. Young

Post by _JLHPROF »

SteelHead wrote:So while the church asks you if you are honest with your fellow men, you are ok with the church lying..... ?


Yes, depending on circumstance.
Just as God says he will forgive whoever he wants but we are required to forgive everyone. Not exactly the same thing of course, but similar principle.

SteelHead wrote:How does one discern then when something promoted as doctrine is a lie, and when it isn't?


Personal revelation. Nobody is getting back to God by any other method.
Joseph Smith taught as much.
Thy mind, O man! if thou wilt lead a soul unto salvation, must stretch as high as the utmost heavens, and search into and contemplate the darkest abyss, and the broad expanse of eternity—thou must commune with God. - Joseph Smith
_grindael
_Emeritus
Posts: 6791
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:15 am

Re: We have the smoothest liars in the world - B. Young

Post by _grindael »

Yes, personal revelation worked so well for Smith when he tried to sell the Book of Mormon copyright and got one from Satan. :redface:
Riding on a speeding train; trapped inside a revolving door;
Lost in the riddle of a quatrain; Stuck in an elevator between floors.
One focal point in a random world can change your direction:
One step where events converge may alter your perception.
_JLHPROF
_Emeritus
Posts: 445
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 1:44 am

Re: We have the smoothest liars in the world - B. Young

Post by _JLHPROF »

grindael wrote:Yes, personal revelation worked so well for Smith when he tried to sell the Book of Mormon copyright and got one from Satan. :redface:


True. False revelation exists as well.
The great debate is how we tell the difference.
Thy mind, O man! if thou wilt lead a soul unto salvation, must stretch as high as the utmost heavens, and search into and contemplate the darkest abyss, and the broad expanse of eternity—thou must commune with God. - Joseph Smith
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: We have the smoothest liars in the world - B. Young

Post by _Chap »

JLHPROF wrote:
grindael wrote:Yes, personal revelation worked so well for Smith when he tried to sell the Book of Mormon copyright and got one from Satan. :redface:


True. False revelation exists as well.
The great debate is how we tell the difference.


Actually, there isn't any debate at all. There's just people asking the same question over and over again in different contexts, and it goes like this:

Q: When a prophet says something important that is claimed to be a revelation, how can we tell whether it is a true revelation from God or not?

A: (crickets chirping)
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_JLHPROF
_Emeritus
Posts: 445
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 1:44 am

Re: We have the smoothest liars in the world - B. Young

Post by _JLHPROF »

Chap wrote:
JLHPROF wrote:True. False revelation exists as well.
The great debate is how we tell the difference.


Actually, there isn't any debate at all. There's just people asking the same question over and over again in different contexts, and it goes like this:

Q: When a prophet says something important that is claimed to be a revelation, how can we tell whether it is a true revelation from God or not?

A: (crickets chirping)


That doesn't refer to personal revelation. I have seen the difference in my life. I am certain that the Lord has communicated things to me for me and nobody else. As I said, God will judge each on how well they listen to him, not how well we obey others.
Thy mind, O man! if thou wilt lead a soul unto salvation, must stretch as high as the utmost heavens, and search into and contemplate the darkest abyss, and the broad expanse of eternity—thou must commune with God. - Joseph Smith
_grindael
_Emeritus
Posts: 6791
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:15 am

Re: We have the smoothest liars in the world - B. Young

Post by _grindael »

JLHPROF wrote:
That doesn't refer to personal revelation. I have seen the difference in my life. I am certain that the Lord has communicated things to me for me and nobody else. As I said, God will judge each on how well they listen to him, not how well we obey others.


You mean you expect YOUR God to judge YOU on how well YOU listen to YOUR God. Using "they" in this instance, is irrelevant to anyone but you, because your subjective experiences are your own. There is no evidence for the Mormon God, (only the feelings of Mormons) which is no evidence at all that your God exists. And according to Mormonism, that God will certainly judge each and every Mormon on how well they obey their file leaders. That is what is wrong with most Mormons who post here, they confuse what the church actually teaches with what they personally believe and more likely than not, they don't agree.

“Those men and women who persist in publicly challenging basic doctrines, practices, and establishment of the Church sever themselves from the Spirit of the Lord and forfeit their right to place and influence in the Church.... There is a certain arrogance in thinking that any of us may be more spiritually intelligent, more learned, or more righteous than the Councils called to preside over us.” -James E. Faust, “Keeping Covenants and Honoring the Priesthood,” Sunstone, 16:6, no. 92, November 1993, p. 72


Neil Maxwell,

Lest the casual observer mistake "following the Brethren" as producing only one-sided pressures, let him listen to the humble words of that great scholar, Elder Talmage: "Ofttimes I tremble, literally, as I consider what am doing when addressing the Latter-day Saints, for I know that what I say unto them is binding upon me, and that I shall be judged by the precepts that I impress upon them; and what I say under such conditions is likewise binding upon those who hear." (Ibid., p. 188.)

Such heavy responsibilities do not rest upon the Brethren without producing real anxieties.

As one examines the typical things that get in the way of following the Brethren, these are among them:

1. There are those who maintain they are wiser and better informed than the Brethren. Therefore, they reject the counsel of the Brethren.

2. There are those who feel the Brethren try to direct them too much in their personal affairs. These individuals may not feel the advice is wrong, but they resent the coaching, especially in what they see as temporal matters.

3. There are those who reject the counsel of the Brethren, not because they disbelieve it or see it as irrelevant, but rather because its timing is inconvenient. They are like one who said, "Give me chastity, but not yet."

4. There are those who reject the counsel of the Brethren in a rather indirect way. They are simply too caught up with the cares of the world even to notice the counsel; they do not, therefore, give place in their life for it. Theirs is the heedlessness of worldly preoccupation, but the consequences of this form of disobedience are just as severe as outright rejection.

5. There are those who reject following the Brethren because they wish to be the leaders. This is a mortal reflection of Lucifer's bid in the premortal world. His need for ascendancy was so great that he simply would not follow. Whether his desire to be chosen drove him to advance his "no-growth, no-loss" approach to mortality or whether he believed in his way so much that he sought ascendancy to further his convictions, we do not fully know. In any event, there are those whose need for ascendancy causes them to be disobedient even if, in their heart of hearts, they know the prophetic counsel given is correct. Ego crowds out all other considerations!

6. Finally, there are those few, like Cain, who, in effect, have gone so far as to have made a deal with the devil; they are on the other side. The passionate intensity with which they pursue their goals makes it, of course, impossible for them to hear the words of God— short of some dramatic confrontation such as we read of with men like Korihor. (Alma 30.)

There are, of course, numerous variations of the above. Some have behavioral lapses and then seek to cover these by pretending to have reservations about a doctrine or a leader. Having misbehaved, they try to cover their sins. It is so fashionable nowadays to have a "noble grievance" with the Brethren. Remember, however, their gift of discernment. The Book of Mormon tells us flatly of one discerning prophet and his confrontation with Korihor:

"But, behold, I have all things as a testimony that these things are true; and ye also have all things as a testimony unto you that they are true; and will ye deny them? Believest thou that these things are true?

"Behold, I know that thou believest, but thou art possessed with a lying spirit, and yet have put off the Spirit of God that it may have no place in you; but the devil has power over you, and he doth carry you about, working devices that he may destroy the children of God." (Alma 30:41-42. Italics added.)

... Following the Brethren is, of course, a different challenge in a society that is sinking rapidly, such as was the case in Sodom and Gomorrah, as compared with following the prophets in a society where there is reasonable righteousness and reasonable happiness. Obedience is required in both settings, to be sure, but there is an intensification of the challenge presented to members of the Church in the one setting compared with the other somewhat more tranquil time and circumstance.

... Another steady follower of the earliest Church leaders was President Wilford Woodruff. In an address given October 6, 1856, he observed, "Whatever counsel the Presidency of this Church have been led to give unto this people, it has been dictated by the Spirit and power of God, and our safety and salvation lies in obeying that counsel and putting it into practice."

President Woodruff then recalled how, when President Young had led them westward, some had "thought it was a wild speculation... dangerous...." It even looked to some that Brigham was "leading the people to destruction," yet "in all ages of the world, it is where the counsels of the Prophets of God are not fully carried out" that destruction is actually assured. (Journal of Discourses 4:94-95.)
Riding on a speeding train; trapped inside a revolving door;
Lost in the riddle of a quatrain; Stuck in an elevator between floors.
One focal point in a random world can change your direction:
One step where events converge may alter your perception.
_Choyo Chagas
_Emeritus
Posts: 914
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:49 am

Re: We have the smoothest liars in the world - B. Young

Post by _Choyo Chagas »

JLHPROF wrote:
grindael wrote:Yes, personal revelation worked so well for Smith when he tried to sell the Book of Mormon copyright and got one from Satan. :redface:
True. False revelation exists as well.
The great debate is how we tell the difference.

you are right
then ok

how we tell the difference? i will not debate it; i will accept your way of determination. (procession of the holy ghost doesn't count as i don't believe in it; choose something real if i may ask. testable, repeatable way)
Choyo Chagas is Chairman of the Big Four, the ruler of the planet from "The Bull's Hour" ( Russian: Час Быка), a social science fiction novel written by Soviet author and paleontologist Ivan Yefremov in 1968.
Six months after its publication Soviet authorities banned the book and attempted to remove it from libraries and bookshops.
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: We have the smoothest liars in the world - B. Young

Post by _Chap »

JLHPROF wrote:True. False revelation exists as well.
The great debate is how we tell the difference.


Chap wrote:
Actually, there isn't any debate at all. There's just people asking the same question over and over again in different contexts, and it goes like this:

Q: When a prophet says something important that is claimed to be a revelation, how can we tell whether it is a true revelation from God or not?

A: (crickets chirping)


JLHPROF wrote:That doesn't refer to personal revelation. I have seen the difference in my life. I am certain that the Lord has communicated things to me for me and nobody else. As I said, God will judge each on how well they listen to him, not how well we obey others.



Good effort at diversion there! But it leaves the problem of top-level prophetic revelation unchanged, just as unanswered as ever, and just as critical as ever.

As grindael has pointed out (as usual with copious and conclusive documentation), your personal revelation is always trumped by that of the leaders of the church.

But it appears that not everything sent out over the First Presidency's signature is in fact a genuine revelation from the Mormon deity, despite the repeated demands from the top of the church that such utterances should be obeyed without question.

How do you deal with that? Disobey? Disbelieve what the prophets and apostles have repeatedly taught?
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_I have a question
_Emeritus
Posts: 9749
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:01 am

Re: We have the smoothest liars in the world - B. Young

Post by _I have a question »

2. Elder Marion G. Romney recalled an experience he had with President Heber J. Grant:
“I remember years ago when I was a bishop I had President Grant talk to our ward. After the meeting, I drove him home. . . . When we got to his home I got out of the car and went up on the porch with him. Standing by me, he put his arm over my shoulder and said: ‘My boy, you always keep your eye on the President of the Church, and if he ever tells you to do anything, and it is wrong, and you do it, the Lord will bless you for it.’ Then with a twinkle in his eye, he said, ‘But you don’t need to worry. The Lord will never let his mouthpiece lead the people astray’” (in Conference Report, Oct. 1960, p. 78).

https://www.lds.org/manual/aaronic-prie ... t?lang=eng

4. President Joseph Fielding Smith explained:
“I think there is one thing which we should have exceedingly clear in our minds. Neither the President of the Church, nor the First Presidency, nor the united voice of the First Presidency and the Twelve will ever lead the Saints astray or send forth counsel to the world that is contrary to the mind and will of the Lord” (in Conference Report, Apr. 1972, p. 99; or Ensign, July 1972, p. 88).
“When we are confronted with evidence that challenges our deeply held beliefs we are more likely to reframe the evidence than we are to alter our beliefs. We simply invent new reasons, new justifications, new explanations. Sometimes we ignore the evidence altogether.” (Mathew Syed 'Black Box Thinking')
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: We have the smoothest liars in the world - B. Young

Post by _Chap »

I have a question wrote:4. President Joseph Fielding Smith explained:
“I think there is one thing which we should have exceedingly clear in our minds. Neither the President of the Church, nor the First Presidency, nor the united voice of the First Presidency and the Twelve will ever lead the Saints astray or send forth counsel to the world that is contrary to the mind and will of the Lord” (in Conference Report, Apr. 1972, p. 99; or Ensign, July 1972, p. 88).


And to guide us in knowing the mind and will of the Lord, this is what we had from the First Presidency in 1949:

http://mit.irr.org/1949-official-mormon ... priesthood

1949 Official Mormon Statement on Blacks and the Priesthood


First Presidency Statement (17 August 1949)1

The attitude of the Church with reference to the Negroes remains as it has always stood. It is not a matter of the declaration of a policy but of direct commandment from the Lord, on which is founded the doctrine of the Church from the days of its organization, to the effect that Negroes may become members of the Church but that they are not entitled to the Priesthood at the present time. The prophets of the Lord have made several statements as to the operation of the principle. President Brigham Young said: “Why are so many of the inhabitants of the earth cursed with a skin of blackness? It comes in consequence of their fathers rejecting the power of the holy priesthood, and the law of God. They will go down to death. And when all the rest of the children have received their blessings in the holy priesthood, then that curse will be removed from the seed of Cain, and they will then come up and possess the priesthood, and receive all the blessings which we now are entitled to.”

President Wilford Woodruff made the following statement: “The day will come when all that race will be redeemed and possess all the blessings which we now have.”

The position of the Church regarding the Negro may be understood when another doctrine of the Church is kept in mind, namely, that the conduct of spirits in the premortal existence has some determining effect upon the conditions and circumstances under which these spirits take on mortality and that while the details of this principle have not been made known, the mortality is a privilege that is given to those who maintain their first estate; and that the worth of the privilege is so great that spirits are willing to come to earth and take on bodies no matter what the handicap may be as to the kind of bodies they are to secure; and that among the handicaps, failure of the right to enjoy in mortality the blessings of the priesthood is a handicap which spirits are willing to assume in order that they might come to earth. Under this principle there is no injustice whatsoever involved in this deprivation as to the holding of the priesthood by the Negroes.

1. Published in many places, e.g., in Neither White nor Black: Mormon Scholars Confront the Race Issue in a Universal Church, ed. Lester E. Bush Jr. and Armand L. Mauss (Midvale, UT: Signature Books, 1984), 221.


So was that the mind and will of the Lord, given by direct commandment, or was it not?

Or was he pulling an Elder Holland trick on the CoJCoLDS when he told them that?
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Post Reply