RockSlider wrote:a man who spent many many hours in the archives before they were locked down and who did his dissertation based on Joseph Smith, and who is in my opinion one of the greatest Mormon theologians. Hyrum Andrus.
In Hyrum's many writings you will notice one thing, copious footnotes, the majority of which are to Mormon Scriptures and The Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith. I would suggest that 1/3 of most pages he produced were footnotes to references that influenced/supported his interpretations of scripture and Joseph Smith's teachings.
The Hierarchy does not like those who make the current LDS Church look adrift from its founder's "vision".
RockSlider wrote:But of course HA has never claimed to be a prophet. another pro for him
One who studies a self-proclaimed 'prophet' (JSjr) but does himself pretend to be a prophet gets a kudo?
RockSlider wrote:Kish, I don't get why you seem to support NL and his cause.
NL's gospel is, it seems to me, that the Book of Mormon is a real history, of peoples believing then not in god, or vice versa. NL seems to hew quite closely to Book of Mormon Mormonism, and not so much D&C/PoGP Mormonism--and finds little redeeming (pun intended) value in the PS&R aspirants. NL latches on to the more mainstream Christian notion that one must be born again, of fire, not just 'baptized' as an ordinance. Apart from the Apocalrock sightings, NL's gospel hearkens to the fundamental Mormon script: the Book of Mormon. And for NL, it is the message, not an institution, prestige and power. NL's appeal lies in his genuineness, a living example of the sacrifice for what one believes.
But as for me, I don't believe any of it, but I admire NL much, much more than those 15 ensconced in the CAB and "apostle" trappings.