Shulem wrote:Since when is a piece of artwork a "history course" in itself? It's not a history course, merely what should be a realistic rendition of the facts as best understood by the person painting them. Viewers are entitled to see art that depicts the facts. After all, the church wants everyone to pay 10% of their income. The Book of Mormon translation serves as an advertisement for the church --a false advertisement too.
I understand, but for many Mormons the only important fact is that Joseph Smith translated the Book of Mormon.
Does this bother you?
https://www.lds.org/media-library/image ... 8?lang=eng
" Most historians surmise that Jesus’ cross was more likely to have been T-shaped, with the vertical element notched to allow executioners to tie the victim to the crossbeam, then raise it and set it securely into the top"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... 0d61145a83