DCP's ongoing problem with plagiarism
- Doctor Scratch
- B.H. Roberts Chair of Mopologetic Studies
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:24 pm
- Location: Cassius University
Re: DCP's ongoing problem with plagiarism
I can’t help but wonder: What do the other Interpreter Board Members think of this? What does Jack Welch think of this? FAIR Mormon? Patheos? Do they not know? Or do they not care? Those would seem to be the only options here.
"If, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
-
Philo Sofee
- God
- Posts: 5847
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:18 am
Re: DCP's ongoing problem with plagiarism
Remember, they all have the Melchizedek Priesthood of God. The mere rules that apply to men and women do not apply to the Melchizedek Priesthood when it is doing the work of the Lord. Therefore, plagiarism, so long as it builds the Kingdom of God, is most assuredly blessed of the Lord.Doctor Scratch wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 12:40 amI can’t help but wonder: What do the other Interpreter Board Members think of this? What does Jack Welch think of this? FAIR Mormon? Patheos? Do they not know? Or do they not care? Those would seem to be the only options here.
-
Dr Exiled
- God
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:40 pm
Re: DCP's ongoing problem with plagiarism
Just F-ing attribute your sources. It's such a problem that it's clearly deliberate.
Myth is misused by the powerful to subjugate the masses all too often.
-
I Have Questions
- God
- Posts: 3775
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: DCP's ongoing problem with plagiarism
Plagiarism isn’t something DCP has an issue doing. Most scholars, caught once, would have the integrity to move heaven and earth to ensure they were never found to have done it again. Even if the plagiarism is as a result of carelessness or working on the confines of a phone, or rushing etc a scholar wouldn’t allow themselves to ever be caught again. Peterson simply doesn’t care that he commits plagiarism, however it comes about. So what does that say about his character?
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
-
I Have Questions
- God
- Posts: 3775
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: DCP's ongoing problem with plagiarism
The best that can be said is that he doesn’t care about committing plagiarism. It’s not a principle he feels is important to uphold, no matter the cause.
At this point, it’s happened so frequently (and we aren’t lucky enough to have recorded all the instances where he’s done it) one has to assume he’s being doing it his whole academic life. I wonder what would be the earliest example of it, high school perhaps?
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
- Rivendale
- God
- Posts: 1842
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:21 pm
Re: DCP's ongoing problem with plagiarism
I still have the theory that they can't see it as plagiarism. Mormonism are tight knit, clicky groups that interpret the world differently. As some have said , if it is faith promoting almost anything goes. But remember Mormonism is parasitic from the leaders perspective. They will draw every conceivable amount of positive information and broadcast far and wide to the world but the second the host becomes hostile or even apathetic they kill the host.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:15 amThe best that can be said is that he doesn’t care about committing plagiarism. It’s not a principle he feels is important to uphold, no matter the cause.
At this point, it’s happened so frequently (and we aren’t lucky enough to have recorded all the instances where he’s done it) one has to assume he’s being doing it his whole academic life. I wonder what would be the earliest example of it, high school perhaps?
-
Tator
- Valiant A
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:51 am
- Location: Pacific Coast
Re: DCP's ongoing problem with plagiarism
Ditto Copy Pasterson is a lazy slow learner and a fast forgetter.
-
I Have Questions
- God
- Posts: 3775
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: DCP's ongoing problem with plagiarism
Those are fair points. But I don’t know another Mormon so-called “scholar” that plagiarises. Peterson stands apart as a prolific plagiariser. He’s a serial offender, and he knows he’s a serial offender. He justifies it by thinking “it’s just a blog, so scholarly standards don’t apply”.Rivendale wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 11:01 amI still have the theory that they can't see it as plagiarism. Mormonism are tight knit, clicky groups that interpret the world differently. As some have said , if it is faith promoting almost anything goes. But remember Mormonism is parasitic from the leaders perspective. They will draw every conceivable amount of positive information and broadcast far and wide to the world but the second the host becomes hostile or even apathetic they kill the host.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:15 amThe best that can be said is that he doesn’t care about committing plagiarism. It’s not a principle he feels is important to uphold, no matter the cause.
At this point, it’s happened so frequently (and we aren’t lucky enough to have recorded all the instances where he’s done it) one has to assume he’s being doing it his whole academic life. I wonder what would be the earliest example of it, high school perhaps?
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
-
drumdude
- God
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am
Re: DCP's ongoing problem with plagiarism
Since his blog is monetized, it’s unethical and it’s stealing other people’s work for personal financial gain. No matter how small, that’s what he’s doing.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 1:10 pmThose are fair points. But I don’t know another Mormon so-called “scholar” that plagiarises. Peterson stands apart as a prolific plagiariser. He’s a serial offender, and he knows he’s a serial offender. He justifies it by thinking “it’s just a blog, so scholarly standards don’t apply”.Rivendale wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 11:01 amI still have the theory that they can't see it as plagiarism. Mormonism are tight knit, clicky groups that interpret the world differently. As some have said , if it is faith promoting almost anything goes. But remember Mormonism is parasitic from the leaders perspective. They will draw every conceivable amount of positive information and broadcast far and wide to the world but the second the host becomes hostile or even apathetic they kill the host.
I think it indicates how little he values personal, moral, and intellectual integrity, and that shows in his apologetic work. If he can spread lies which promote Mormonism, he’s more than happy to do so.
-
Marcus
- God
- Posts: 7802
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm
Re: DCP's ongoing problem with plagiarism
[bolding added.]
This is the key argument against Peterson's insistence that his personal blog isn't really 'published' material, therefore it's not plagiarism. His blog entries contain many, many instances of stealing the intellectual property of other authors. Just because he thinks it's okay to steal their material because he's not really 'publishing' it doesn't mean it's not theft of intellectual property.
In fact, the institutions who legitimately publish works by the people he steals from uniformly define what he is doing on his blog as theft of intellectual property. Everyone is in agreement, from patheos to BYU to Wikipedia to every source Peterson steals from: Plagiarism is defined is stealing someone else's work, regardless of where you put it.
Additionally, this thread documents a multitude of Peterson's plagiarized publications across more than just his blog. It documents his plagiarisms at the Deseret News, the LDS meridian and lifestyle magazines, and even in the Interpreter itself.