mentalgymnast wrote:Most if not all of the views of God out there just didn't/don't make sense to me. The only one(s) that do are the ones that teach that we are literally created in the image/form of God.
I admit, this was a bit of a shocking statement to me as it is almost the polar opposite of my view. While I lean atheistic, I don't tend to view myself as a hard atheist so much as the notions of God which I've encountered to date seem highly improbable given the evidence, and that seems to be a trend I can count on.
But of all the improbable ideas out there, the notion that we homo sapien sapiens are prototyped off of a divine, physically present in space-time homo sapien celestii to whom we bear pre-mortal kinship and like whom we may transform into is at the top of the list of improbables. It implies conclusions that are contradicted by just about every branch of modern science from biology to physics. It appropriates the histories of ancient peoples and their mythologies beyond what our investigation of history supports, and has to my mind nothing inherent within the concept to really recommend it.
So I'm genuinely curious what makes this the one concept that makes sense to anyone given even the slightest bit of reflection on what it means for everything we know about the natural universe around us.