Bible Stories Where God Gave Empirical Evidence to Doubters

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_deacon blues
_Emeritus
Posts: 952
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 5:51 am

Re: Bible Stories Where God Gave Empirical Evidence to Doubt

Post by _deacon blues »

Maksutov wrote:
Philo Sofee wrote:
Correct, an invented phantasm is not real, so neither has anyone else ever had it... none of which is relevant to the fact that the Bible portrays God as insisting and agreeing with empirical evidences for his own reality and validity.


I once had a BIL who received a firm witness from the HG that he was to marry a young latterday sister. She didn't get the same witness. No matter how he testified to her and prayed. :lol: :lol: :lol: That's about what it's worth. :wink:


This is Still happening. :surprised: My grand-daughter who attends BYU shared a story tonight about a room mate who had this happen to her. :rolleyes:
_DoubtingThomas
_Emeritus
Posts: 4551
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:04 am

Re: Bible Stories Where God Gave Empirical Evidence to Doubt

Post by _DoubtingThomas »

Philo Sofee wrote:
Intellectually we are, because it is necessary to see where the evidence leads, and it don't go down the road of Alma or Paul.....


Yes. So it is obvious that God is not the same yesterday, today, and forever
_Philo Sofee
_Emeritus
Posts: 6660
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:04 am

Re: Bible Stories Where God Gave Empirical Evidence to Doubt

Post by _Philo Sofee »

DoubtingThomas wrote:
Philo Sofee wrote:
Intellectually we are, because it is necessary to see where the evidence leads, and it don't go down the road of Alma or Paul.....


Yes. So it is obvious that God is not the same yesterday, today, and forever


True. It's because we humans keep changing and make sure our invented Gods change with us so we can remain comfortable with them. God cannot remain the same because humans can't.
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."
Post Reply