DiscussMormonism.com

RockSlider wrote:

Nightlion wrote:This is truly a great composition. Irrefutable: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qz77atYHTOA

Irrefutable, too funny ... every point made has a counter argument that has been presented innumerable times.

You really should check out the debates over these topics.

Once again you bring nothing but intellectual shaming. Say something or just say nothing. God hate campaign rhetoric is fake news.

Nightlion wrote:Once again you bring nothing but intellectual shaming. Say something or just say nothing. God hate campaign rhetoric is fake news.

Here is a nice site that lays out both sides of the arguments for you, give it a try.

http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=Main_Page

RockSlider wrote:

Nightlion wrote:Once again you bring nothing but intellectual shaming. Say something or just say nothing. God hate campaign rhetoric is fake news.

Here is a nice site that lays out both sides of the arguments for you, give it a try.

http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=Main_Page

What's up here guys. Are you all so peed pants that you got to bring in a bully to fight your battles for you. Open your own mouths and speak your truth. Your credibility is already in shambles before me.

Nightlion wrote:What's up here guys. Are you all so peed pants that you got to bring in a bully to fight your battles for you. Open your own mouths and speak your truth. Your credibility is already in shambles before me.

Irony.

When your credibility is in shambles for the guy who sees portents in puddles, and omens in shadows on rocks.

SteelHead wrote:

Nightlion wrote:What's up here guys. Are you all so peed pants that you got to bring in a bully to fight your battles for you. Open your own mouths and speak your truth. Your credibility is already in shambles before me.

Irony.

When your credibility is in shambles for the guy who sees portents in puddles, and omens in shadows on rocks.

More cultnic speak. Why is this so consistent with atheists? This has to prove something. Some sort of surrender to mass hysterics.

Nightlion wrote:You missed the obvious. Everything right down to DNA has intelligence that is not created. It is organized by a creator. It was always something.

if you think the makers of this video would argue or are saying anything about God organizing eternally contained pure and fine matter into stuff, you're clearly fooling yourself. They've concluded God made everything out of nothing. Of course the video, when I try to break it down, contains very little of anything beyond assumption built upon assumption.

Stem wrote:

Nightlion wrote:You missed the obvious. Everything right down to DNA has intelligence that is not created. It is organized by a creator. It was always something.

if you think the makers of this video would argue or are saying anything about God organizing eternally contained pure and fine matter into stuff, you're clearly fooling yourself. They've concluded God made everything out of nothing. Of course the video, when I try to break it down, contains very little of anything beyond assumption built upon assumption.

These are Catholics. Of course they have no idea about the mechanics and resources of creation. They do not comprehend the actual age of the earth either. What is remarkable is the intricacies they amply demonstrate in the precision of creation and the intelligence of micro mechanisms. That is sufficient to celebrate the great job they made of it.

Ceeboo wrote:I think it has something to do with green grapes, right?



Or no?

I just note that you don't ever seem interested in understanding the science.

Themis wrote:I just note that you don't ever seem interested in understanding the science.

Note away ace - but, while you're at it, make a note to yourself too. "Dear self, I might consider being a little less confident with Ceeboo. He might actually know a whole lot more about this than I presume he does."

by the way - So it wasn't the green grapes then? You never answered my question.

Peace,
Ceeboo

Ceeboo wrote:

Themis wrote:I just note that you don't ever seem interested in understanding the science.

Note away ace - but, while you're at it, make a note to yourself too. "Dear self, I might consider being a little less confident with Ceeboo. He might actually know a whole lot more about this than I presume he does."

I did use the word seem. So why would science consider raccoons and whales to be fairly related in comparison to other other animals?